|
|
| Rating: 10 |
Listening to the few tracks online tells me that this record is going to be amazing! Altered states of conciousness is great!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 qlacs - 11.03.2011 at 22:20
|
|
|
| Rating: 9 |
This will hit the Top 20 this year in the very front.
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 8 |
Perfect album like 08' Conclusion Of An Age !
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 8 |
Awesome...I Like it 
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 10 |
Written by qlacs on 11.03.2011 at 22:20
This will hit the Top 20 this year in the very front.
We need to get their profile to not be visible on the site. I've done tons of research trying to complete the members section but I can't find anything. Maybe we should just contact the band lol.
|
|
|
|
qlacs - 13.03.2011 at 17:53
|
|
|
| Rating: 9 |
Go then, they need more fans! 
|
|
|
|
qlacs - 13.03.2011 at 17:53
|
|
|
| Rating: 9 |
Go then, they need more fans!
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 10 |
I sent a message using the online form on their website ... lets see if it gets anywhere. I honestly can't find any info about band members on the internets.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Great album, I believe this will be top 20 in this year..Excelent
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 6 |
Damn solid album. Well balanced thrash and melodeath that even the so-so vocals don't spoil.
Although: 72 minutes long? Why?
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 8 |
Curious as to why this hasn't cracked the top 20 yet? It has enough votes and certainly has a high enough rating.
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 10 |
Cos the band's profile is invisible i think? :/
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Written by !J.O.O.E.! on 22.03.2011 at 20:11
Damn solid album. Well balanced thrash and melodeath that even the so-so vocals don't spoil.
Although: 72 minutes long? Why?
Yeah, I guess they could save some stuff for the next release
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 6 |
Written by Abattoir on 25.03.2011 at 14:16
Written by !J.O.O.E.! on 22.03.2011 at 20:11
Damn solid album. Well balanced thrash and melodeath that even the so-so vocals don't spoil.
Although: 72 minutes long? Why?
Yeah, I guess they could save some stuff for the next release
They couldn've made two releases out of the material on this one o.O I didn't make it through the whole thing though it did seem to be pretty good shizzle.
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 10 |
To be honest I'd rather they made as much use out of the 80-min capacity of CDs as they can - given that they're usually the same price, I'd rather get an album with 60+min of material than on the short end of 40. And I personally love the album enough to listen through it front to back on a near-daily basis at the moment, but I'm happy enough to admit I'm borderline fanboy with this band.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Excellent album, and one of the strongest releases of the year thus far. That is saying a lot because this has been a year of great releases by both known and unknown bands. The one problem I have is that the album is a tad long. Having said that, it is still an excellent record and one I'm thoroughly enjoying months after its release.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The prospect of a 72 minute album is discouraging me to even download it
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 10 |
Written by Ag Fox on 05.05.2011 at 14:51
The prospect of a 72 minute album is discouraging me to even download it
Why? Its a great album. The length of it doesnt hurt it at all.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Written by BaneConall on 05.05.2011 at 21:26
Written by Ag Fox on 05.05.2011 at 14:51
The prospect of a 72 minute album is discouraging me to even download it
Why? Its a great album. The length of it doesnt hurt it at all.
from what I heard with myspace, it's pretty good, but not that good which warrants it a gripping 72 minute listen if you know what I mean
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 10 |
Written by Ag Fox on 05.05.2011 at 21:30
Written by BaneConall on 05.05.2011 at 21:26
Written by Ag Fox on 05.05.2011 at 14:51
The prospect of a 72 minute album is discouraging me to even download it
Why? Its a great album. The length of it doesnt hurt it at all.
from what I heard with myspace, it's pretty good, but not that good which warrants it a gripping 72 minute listen if you know what I mean
I guess its just up to personal opinion. I mostly listen to it while doing something else (as I do with most of my music) so you don't really feel the length of an album that much.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Damn, I like it musically but I can't get over the vocals.
Listened to it 2 times in a row, but the vocals just aren't my cup of tea.
I will try again cause overall it's a good album.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Yeah, 72 minutes for this style of music is ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 8 |
Written by Dizzeke on 13.05.2011 at 21:51
Damn, I like it musically but I can't get over the vocals.
Listened to it 2 times in a row, but the vocals just aren't my cup of tea.
I will try again cause overall it's a good album.
Exactly the same case with me as well. The vocals made me give it a slightly lower rating. Otherwise this is definitely deserving a 9.
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 6 |
The vocals are really a huge minus, and the length of the cd aswell. But overall, it's oceans better than their last effort, which was mediocre at best. (Ok, it mediocre in a good way, but the 'been there done that' feeling was way too strong.)
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 10 |
Have to say my biggest suprise of the year now im jus hitting my head on the wall wonderin why ive never heard of them before
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 10 |
Thrash Melodic Death with a touch of metalcore and the whole thing is watered by Progressive Metal \mm/
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 8 |
A very good album but definitely too long. Some songs aren't that memorable...but the ones that are excellent!
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 9 |
I see length being a huge thing with most people. While I agree that the album is a bit long, it is definitely consistent throughout, which is no small feat. One of the better releases this year, no doubt.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
BITCHES! STOP BRINGING THIS ALBUM DOWN WITH YOUR 1s!!! D:<
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 10 |
Written by MechanisT on 11.09.2011 at 23:25
BITCHES! STOP BRINGING THIS ALBUM DOWN WITH YOUR 1s!!! D:<
Thank you.
You wanted them made visible, and now look what has happened. You've doomed us all.
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Written by snake? snaaaake! on 12.09.2011 at 00:01
Written by MechanisT on 11.09.2011 at 23:25
BITCHES! STOP BRINGING THIS ALBUM DOWN WITH YOUR 1s!!! D:<
Thank you.
You wanted them made visible, and now look what has happened. You've doomed us all.
If only I had the hindsight...
|
|
|
|
K†ulu - 12.09.2011 at 11:57
|
|
|
| |
Written by MechanisT on 12.09.2011 at 00:02
Written by snake? snaaaake! on 12.09.2011 at 00:01
Written by MechanisT on 11.09.2011 at 23:25
BITCHES! STOP BRINGING THIS ALBUM DOWN WITH YOUR 1s!!! D:<
Thank you.
You wanted them made visible, and now look what has happened. You've doomed us all.
If only I had the hindsight...
forgot Havok?
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Written by K†ulu on 12.09.2011 at 11:57
Written by MechanisT on 12.09.2011 at 00:02
Written by snake? snaaaake! on 12.09.2011 at 00:01
Written by MechanisT on 11.09.2011 at 23:25
BITCHES! STOP BRINGING THIS ALBUM DOWN WITH YOUR 1s!!! D:<
Thank you.
You wanted them made visible, and now look what has happened. You've doomed us all.
If only I had the hindsight...
forgot Havok?
Not, unfortunately... 
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 9 |
Very well done album! The first -core album I've ever liked, but then again, the thrash and death dominates in this.
Good job, Sylosis. \m/
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 8 |
A slight improvement on their debut album,yet i prefer the vocals on 'Conclusion of an age'. Plus 'Empyreal (Part 2)' would have been better off being conjoined with 'Empyreal'.
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 10 |
Written by Kvltness_94 on 03.01.2012 at 21:03
Piece of shit. 'nuff said
You seem to think that about a lot of albums this year ...
|
|
|
|
|
| Rating: 9 |
Written by BaneConall on 05.01.2012 at 21:10
Written by Kvltness_94 on 03.01.2012 at 21:03
Piece of shit. 'nuff said
You seem to think that about a lot of albums this year ...
brotip: don't argue with the elitists... all you can do is let them pass by and ignore them 
awesome album btw! i like how they use the subtle keyboards even more than in their previous album!
good stuff :p 
|
|
|
Advertise on Metal Storm
|
Loading...
