|
|
They could've given us more seconds 
But I don't dislike it. |
|
|
|
Indeed, more seconds would have been great !   |
|
|
|
I don't want any snippets, I just want the album. Never really liked song trailers and all.
But don't mind me, I'm just being bitchy today  |
|
 Varjo - 06.08.2011 at 15:57
|
|
|
"For those keeping score, 71 seconds is 9.34% of the song's 11:03 total running time."
It's a 60-second snippet; listen to it once before showing off your uber math skillz.
Edit: Which are a complety fail as I noticed just now. |
|
 RcK - 06.08.2011 at 17:33
|
|
|
Written by Varjo on 06.08.2011 at 15:57
"For those keeping score, 71 seconds is 9.34% of the song's 11:03 total running time."
It's a 60-second snippet; listen to it once before showing off your uber math skillz.
Edit: Which are a complety fail as I noticed just now.
Blame Roadrunner, the numbers are from their source A complete math fail indeed. |
|
|
|
| Indeed a great teaser....! |
|
|
|
That is indeed a math fail. The song lasts 663 seconds, and this is a 71-second sample. 71 divided by 663 equals .10708898944193061840120663650075, so the sample is therefore 10.7089% of the song.
For this one, I used a calculator, in case you're wondering. |
|
|
|
Written by Black Conundrum on 06.08.2011 at 23:36
For this one, I used a calculator, in case you're wondering.
Aww, for a moment there you had me thinking you were the first MetalStormer in the running for a Nobel Prize in mathematics 
Seeing the kind of utter crap super-duper bands Roadrunner has on their roster, math fails are the least you can expect from these guys though. |
|
|
|
| Nice track, better than the first one |
|
|
|
| Amazing one |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Still not convincing me... |
|
Advertise on Metal Storm
|
