Metal Storm logo
Communism



Posts: 508   Visited by: 294 users

Original post

Posted by , 28.08.2006 - 01:36
Over the course of the last two weeks i have seen a lot of references to communism, unanimously either dismissive of it's possibility or simply against it because of the whole Soviet experiment in the 20th century.

This thread is one for educating the mass of metalstormers just what communism is about, why communists believe it is a viable economic model, and the history of communism, and hopefully there are some commies here apart from me who can contribute to discussion about the finer and undecided points (what form should the revolution take, where/when, etc).

Here's a few starting points that i want to make quite clear:

1) There has never been a communist society existing on a national level. None have ever claimed to be communist. Of the very few that call themselves socialist, hardly any are truly socialist in the actual literal definition of the word. Referring to china, north korea or russia in this thread is pointless, as none of those are connected in any meaningful manner to Communism.

2) Communism is the STATELESS society achieved after an international proletarian revolution, which abolishes the oppressive capitalist system in all it's forms, and to it's deepest roots. I'm talking total and complete wiping of the board and remaking it all. No more money, no more companies, no more countries, no more employment, no more religion (negotiable according to some communists), an entire life change. This comes to be after a lengthy and natural transition period known as socialism, where an organization of workers coordinates the activities the proletariat for it's own benefit.

3) Communism means revolution, and not some wussy social revolution. It cannot be achieved through the political system, the political system must be overthrown and destroyed, as it (like all institutions of our society) exists solely to concentrate power (and therefore money) in the hands of a few. The scale and conduct of the revolution is a matter of debate amongst communists.

4) Anarchism (in it's pure form) is exactly as above, except that anarchists believe that we will be able to, and must, slip straight into communism after the revolution, so i count anarchists as communists. Henceforth then people adhering to the principles stated above will be referred to as marxists.



Question, comment, challenge or even flame, but please oh please at least have read this post before writing "COMMIES FVKK3D UP RUSSKIELAND!!11", or even a coherent and valid post raging against the PRK, PRC or (former)USSR. And any other MS commies lend a hand please!
24.08.2009 - 20:05
Fhuesc

@Ellrohir: don't get me wrong, but k7 and you, need to understand that the URSS wasn't a communist country, even more, it never was a socialist one. And the fact that both of you, had a better life now that when you were children, doesn't mean that everyone else does, i can assure you that most of the people that lived in the URSS are in worst conditions now that then.

@belisarius: so we agree that visually the disease change (now we have cars, computers, etc), but the treatment from 100 years ago still functions. That's why Leninism doesn't need an update NOW, in the future as the revolution advances and the experience modifies the theory and viceversa, obliviously that Marxism-Leninism will change.

Ok, the interpretation changes, but doesn't that means that now we have the same problems?, how are they fixed now?. With communication, that wont disappear in communism. Continuing with the air traffic control, conventions for standardization will continue to exist.

History interprets the past not philosophy, true that the way history interprets the past is biased depending on the current ruling philosophy. Also if a philosopher knows the how, what and why, can't he use the knowledge to change his/her surroundings when he doesn't agree with them? (bourgeoisie has been doing this since before the industrial revolution).

But you can't say that capitalism and much less nazism are enlighting currents, on the contrary those are brutalization ideas. The fraternity of the French revolution disappear long before the 20th century, but it's true that with the installation of the imperialist capitalism, human relationships became even more selfish, idiotic and destructive.
----
Hasta la victoria, siempre!
Until victory, always!
Loading...
24.08.2009 - 20:27
Ellrohir
Heaven Knight
Well i feel sorry for people living in bad condition (when they arent responsible for their fate himselfes - some "poor people" are), but i ask again - why should be i punished for that by system?
----
My rest seems now calm and deep
Finally I got my dead man sleep


Loading...
25.08.2009 - 07:28
Fhuesc

I didn't get your question, but if you are asking why should you be poorer for the sake of the immense majority that has nothing and works like a slave? Dont you think that a really selfish thought? Fuck the world as long i feel comfortable.
----
Hasta la victoria, siempre!
Until victory, always!
Loading...
25.08.2009 - 09:59
Ellrohir
Heaven Knight
First of all i will ask what I have done wrong that i ended like a slave...in current system we have choices, opinions, chances...
----
My rest seems now calm and deep
Finally I got my dead man sleep


Loading...
25.08.2009 - 10:01
Khaldi

I think Communism is a great shit !! certainly I have not seen the communism ( fortunately probably) , but judge by a tales about her from my parents I really hate this mode.
----
Urartu is a NeoHittite and ProtoArmenian kingdom !!
Loading...
25.08.2009 - 14:32
Bad English
Tage Westerlund
Written by Khaldi on 25.08.2009 at 10:01

I think Communism is a great shit !! certainly I have not seen the communism ( fortunately probably) , but judge by a tales about her from my parents I really hate this mode.


Finaly somebody underdnds me, same here actaulay if red scums find out what my parents did and lsiten n reda in fucking ussr days they be dead so I hate it
----
Life is to short for LOVE, there is many great things to do online !!!

Stormtroopers of Death - ''Speak English or Die''
apos;'
[image]
I better die, because I never will learn speek english, so I choose dieing
Loading...
25.08.2009 - 16:10
Ellrohir
Heaven Knight
People from countries where "so called communism" was introduced are usually saying the same...only people who have no experiences should think, it will work...always there will be people who will ruin the "pure idea" turning it into mad tyranny
----
My rest seems now calm and deep
Finally I got my dead man sleep


Loading...
25.08.2009 - 18:17
belisarius

Written by Ellrohir on 25.08.2009 at 16:10

People from countries where "so called communism" was introduced are usually saying the same...only people who have no experiences should think, it will work...always there will be people who will ruin the "pure idea" turning it into mad tyranny

That's why i wan't to keep it a philosophy and not politics. It's only when Marxism came to politics that something went wrong.
----
I am a God in the deepest corner of my mind
Loading...
26.08.2009 - 01:04
Uller

This discussion is pointless.... WHY!?
@Ellrohir,K7,Vishapakahr: "There has never been a communist society existing on a national level. None have ever claimed to be communist. Of the very few that call themselves socialist, hardly any are truly socialist in the actual literal definition of the word. Referring to china, north korea or russia in this thread is pointless, as none of those are connected in any meaningful manner to Communism."

This one is not pointless...
@Belisarius: Humanity has no progress just by thinking; ideas, philosophy needs to be implemented so that there is progress.
And again in a socialist country is not just ONE guy who is marxist, and its not just ONE guy who rules (e.g Stalin) its a more complex structure, where minorities submits to the majorities, a dictatorship of just one person or a few is not socialism or communism; socialism is the dictatorship of the majorities, the proletariat.

I think that saying that Marxism must be keep just as a philosophy is reactionary.
----
Loading...
26.08.2009 - 01:20
Fhuesc

Written by Ellrohir on 25.08.2009 at 09:59

First of all i will ask what I have done wrong that i ended like a slave...in current system we have choices, opinions, chances...

In socialism you wont end like a slave, on the contrary you will have freedom and all the choices, options and chances that you claim this system has. Like i once ask belisarius, do you have any mean of survival if you or your parents are laid off from your/their current job? we, the vast majority don't have other thing in this world that our labour force, therefore we are chained for all our lives to what bourgeoisie gives us, so choices, opinions and chances are reduced to "in which place i'm exploited the less".

@Vishapakahr: don't u think is kinda pathetic that you don't have an opinion on your own and based on real facts, instead of what your parents told you?, at least Bad English has the excuse of "i grew up in that system".
----
Hasta la victoria, siempre!
Until victory, always!
Loading...
26.08.2009 - 01:22
Ellrohir
Heaven Knight
Written by Uller on 26.08.2009 at 01:04

I think that saying that Marxism must be keep just as a philosophy is reactionary.


i am a bit uncertain about meaning of this sentence should you please explain, what you mean with it?
----
My rest seems now calm and deep
Finally I got my dead man sleep


Loading...
26.08.2009 - 01:46
Uller

Written by Ellrohir on 26.08.2009 at 01:22

Written by Uller on 26.08.2009 at 01:04

I think that saying that Marxism must be keep just as a philosophy is reactionary.


i am a bit uncertain about meaning of this sentence should you please explain, what you mean with it?

Knowing the science behind communism, and accepting that it has a progression seed in it, and a chance to make things better for this world, and then denying the praxis and wanting to remain only as an idea. To me this is reactionary.
----
Loading...
26.08.2009 - 02:11
Ellrohir
Heaven Knight
And what do you think will be good?
----
My rest seems now calm and deep
Finally I got my dead man sleep


Loading...
26.08.2009 - 20:52
Uller

Written by Ellrohir on 26.08.2009 at 02:11

And what do you think will be good?

Fight for it, "The proletariat has nothing to lose, only their chains"
----
Loading...
26.08.2009 - 22:23
Ellrohir
Heaven Knight
Then we'll should meet each other on the barricades - each of us on one side...
----
My rest seems now calm and deep
Finally I got my dead man sleep


Loading...
27.08.2009 - 01:55
Uller

Written by Ellrohir on 26.08.2009 at 22:23

Then we'll should meet each other on the barricades - each of us on one side...


Perhaps we do not face directly, but you will face someone with the same ideals, the same rage, and the same dream of liberty.
----
Loading...
27.08.2009 - 09:11
Ellrohir
Heaven Knight
Hm...i see liberty in other things than in communist idea...
----
My rest seems now calm and deep
Finally I got my dead man sleep


Loading...
28.08.2009 - 19:46
Fhuesc

@Ellrohir: in which other ideas you see liberty?
----
Hasta la victoria, siempre!
Until victory, always!
Loading...
28.08.2009 - 19:59
Ellrohir
Heaven Knight
For example right to own property or money, when i am able to get it and hold it?
----
My rest seems now calm and deep
Finally I got my dead man sleep


Loading...
28.08.2009 - 20:05
Fhuesc

I agree, owning a house is a need, also have money for real needs; but owning 7 houses is so unnecessary and unfair, also have so much money that you start creating false needs, like a 8 mil dollar watch, don't you think?
----
Hasta la victoria, siempre!
Until victory, always!
Loading...
28.08.2009 - 20:24
Ellrohir
Heaven Knight
Man thats nothing but pure enviousness...well of course they are people, who had their property through some illegal activities, but then accuse them at court a dont blame other people, who were successful enough in life and can afford 8M watch...

i always give an example of Bill Gates here...or Brin and Page (Google founders)...they are now rich as hell, but they started as common students like most of us here...they just had visions and were able to follow them...
----
My rest seems now calm and deep
Finally I got my dead man sleep


Loading...
28.08.2009 - 20:38
Fhuesc

So, you really think that "all you need to be successful in life is a great idea and determination", and also you don't see nothing wrong in a 8M watch, when half of the world lives in misery?
----
Hasta la victoria, siempre!
Until victory, always!
Loading...
28.08.2009 - 23:06
Ellrohir
Heaven Knight
And your treatment is to take wealth from the second half...where is justice for those "successful" people?
----
My rest seems now calm and deep
Finally I got my dead man sleep


Loading...
29.08.2009 - 06:39
Fhuesc

First, not all the other half has wealth, they just dont live in misery, but most lives barely ok. Just a super small percertaje of the people has the money for the 8M watch. And no, the idea is not to take the money, savings, etc., the idea is to take the means of production and make em "public".
----
Hasta la victoria, siempre!
Until victory, always!
Loading...
29.08.2009 - 09:35
Ellrohir
Heaven Knight
Well i think i am still affected but what happened in our country in 1948 and in Russia 1917, because i cant imagine how your "good system" will work in real? should you explain it more? (if you did already, i appologize)
----
My rest seems now calm and deep
Finally I got my dead man sleep


Loading...
29.08.2009 - 21:49
Fhuesc

No, the URSS was never a communist country, not even a socialist one. Do you want know what happened?, the first problem was called Stalin, he was an asshole, he made several mistakes that lead to the third point; second, in the WWII most of the best commies died fighting the fascism; and finally, the counterrevolution managed to infiltrate the central committee, achieving in that way, the corruption and bureaucratization of the committee, which lead to a state-controlled capitalism, that's what you lived, not socialism.
----
Hasta la victoria, siempre!
Until victory, always!
Loading...
29.08.2009 - 22:23
Ellrohir
Heaven Knight
So explain me, how your "real socialism" will work
----
My rest seems now calm and deep
Finally I got my dead man sleep


Loading...
31.08.2009 - 00:52
Fhuesc

In real socialism the state is mostly there to control the remains of the bourgeoisie (great and little) and the reactionary proletariat. Its participation in the economics is merely a guide and the democracy is participative not representative like today. All the bureaucracy will not earn more than a worker and he/she can be removed in any time in needed. So let me ask you, did the USSR had this qualities?
----
Hasta la victoria, siempre!
Until victory, always!
Loading...
31.08.2009 - 05:29
Uller

Maybe this can help with some doubts:

"We Communists have been reproached with the desire of abolishing the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man's own labour, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence.

Hard-won, self-acquired, self-earned property! Do you mean the property of petty artisan and of the small peasant, a form of property that preceded the bourgeois form? There is no need to abolish that; the development of industry has to a great extent already destroyed it, and is still destroying it daily.

Or do you mean the modern bourgeois private property?

But does wage-labour create any property for the labourer? Not a bit. It creates capital, i.e., that kind of property which exploits wage-labour, and which cannot increase except upon condition of begetting a new supply of wage-labour for fresh exploitation. Property, in its present form, is based on the antagonism of capital and wage labour. Let us examine both sides of this antagonism.

To be a capitalist, is to have not only a purely personal, but a social status in production. Capital is a collective product, and only by the united action of many members, nay, in the last resort, only by the united action of all members of society, can it be set in motion.

Capital is therefore not only personal; it is a social power.

When, therefore, capital is converted into common property, into the property of all members of society, personal property is not thereby transformed into social property. It is only the social character of the property that is changed. It loses its class character [... ]

[...]In bourgeois society, living labour is but a means to increase accumulated labour. In Communist society, accumulated labour is but a means to widen, to enrich, to promote the existence of the labourer.

In bourgeois society, therefore, the past dominates the present; in Communist society, the present dominates the past. In bourgeois society capital is independent and has individuality, while the living person is dependent and has no individuality. "
Karl Marx - The communist manifesto
----
Loading...
31.08.2009 - 09:10
Ellrohir
Heaven Knight
Written by Fhuesc on 31.08.2009 at 00:52

So let me ask you, did the USSR had this qualities?

i dont ask you about USSR situation...i wanna hear your imagination of working socialist state, when you are about fighting for it...
----
My rest seems now calm and deep
Finally I got my dead man sleep


Loading...