Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 24.11.2011 at 21:58

Please stay on-topic

Sorry about that...

Written by Angelic Storm on 24.11.2011 at 22:41

Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 24.11.2011 at 21:58

Please stay on-topic

Sorry about that...

It happens from titme to time to the best of us

Idk about you guys but.....
releases like this, their previous one Black Future, Toxic Holocaust's last two LP's, some Municipal Waste, and Lazarus A.D.'s debut are enough to convince me that these newer thrash bands are pretty darn good. I mean yeah, the "classics" of the genre are better (you know what albums im talkin about), but I prefer most of these new bands to the new stuff by Sodom, Megadeth, Heathen, Overkill, and Helstar. Death Angel's last album was an exception, I freakin love that thing.

Now, to listen to Marcel, I like how there is a lot of variety to this. To a band that has kind become known for ambition, I think they did a good job not to disappoint there. My only negative is it's got so many of those mini 3 second long guitar solos/interludes that it actually changes their style from a kind of grim thrash-with-black-influence to this quite melodic flashy thrash band with black-ish vocals...to my ears anyways.

Otherwise though, really really like this album.

I say this with respect for your opinions, Troy, but I think this is the first time I have found myself agreeing whole-heartedly with you. While I can certainly see the technical prowess in this release, it hardly merits a #1 spot on this year's Top of 2011 list. I am no expert in the virtues of modern thrash, though. I only recently discovered Helstar and Testament

Written by Angelic Storm on 24.11.2011 at 22:41

Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 24.11.2011 at 21:58
Please stay on-topic

Sorry about that...

I'd also like to see a review of this in your words, if you're keen (and would punctuate 'its' correctly ). I share about half of your taste for thrash, and I very very much enjoyed Vektor's material up to now. I gave a few listens to the two songs provided by the band/label online, and for one reason or another found myself disappointed to a degree... thinking the rest of the album must be up to their IMO brilliant standard if it's still doing so well in the MS ratings. (I'm almost amazed it's still above 9, whether taking those two tracks into consideration or not.) I don't think it's beyond them to put out three incredible albums in a row, or highlight-of-the-year stuff again, I just refuse to blindly buy into the hype. Well, blindly minus eight minutes

Regardless, if you don't choose to hear and write on this album, I'd still be quite happy to read your takes on something else

Written by Syk on 25.11.2011 at 10:04
I'd also like to see a review of this in your words, if you're keen (and would punctuate 'its' correctly ). I share about half of your taste for thrash, and I very very much enjoyed Vektor's material up to now. I gave a few listens to the two songs provided by the band/label online, and for one reason or another found myself disappointed to a degree... thinking the rest of the album must be up to their IMO brilliant standard if it's still doing so well in the MS ratings. (I'm almost amazed it's still above 9, whether taking those two tracks into consideration or not.) I don't think it's beyond them to put out three incredible albums in a row, or highlight-of-the-year stuff again, I just refuse to blindly buy into the hype. Well, blindly minus eight minutes

Regardless, if you don't choose to hear and write on this album, I'd still be quite happy to read your takes on something else

What? I do punctuate "it's" correctly! My last review was cut quite considerably, but it wasn't edited due to punctuation errors. (at least not that I noticed)

When you say you'd like to see a "review of this" in my words, are you meaning this album? (Vektor's latest) Or "Unseen" by The Haunted? I have never heard Vektor, but I will rectify that soon. Though I've heard other revivalist thrash bands being raved about, then when I've heard them, I've been very disappointed, so I take the hype over them very much with a pinch of salt. At least until I've listened to them.

And thank you.

Written by Angelic Storm on 24.11.2011 at 13:21

I haven't heard Vektor, so I can't comment on them, but bands like Warbringer, Evile, Bonded By Blood etc just haven't done anything that has excited me.

then please, go listen (A LOT) to all the rerecorded songs that this album contains (tetrastructural minds, fast pace society, venus project). go listen to "Echoless Chamber" to "Hunger For Violence" and then come here and comment. this band is really awesome and different...

Vektor has NO SIMILARITIES with those bands you've mentioned... try it for yourself...

Written by Angelic Storm on 25.11.2011 at 10:28

Oh yeah, sorry, I did mean this one. Like Troy said, it'd be great to have a review of this from someone who isn't madly jumping (or continuing to hang) on the bandwagon. So to speak... hahaha. If you'd rather do The Haunted instead, though, go for it

MS reviews aside, I agreed to some extent about the lack of freshness or outstandingness of the new thrash crop, but I must calmly side with Deadmeat on his last point. They really are something else, in my view... I'm just slightly hesitant to say, keeping in mind your past comments on Morbid Saint and Vio-lence

Written by Syk on 25.11.2011 at 11:07
Oh yeah, sorry, I did mean this one. Like Troy said, it'd be great to have a review of this from someone who isn't madly jumping (or continuing to hang) on the bandwagon. So to speak... hahaha. If you'd rather do The Haunted instead, though, go for it

MS reviews aside, I agreed to some extent about the lack of freshness or outstandingness of the new thrash crop, but I must calmly side with Deadmeat on his last point. They really are something else, in my view... I'm just slightly hesitant to say, keeping in mind your past comments on Morbid Saint and Vio-lence

I think Troy was meaning "Unseen" when he said that. I can't review the new Vektor album until 3 months have passed since it's release.

Well, once I have listened to Vektor, I will give my verdict on them.

Written by Troy Killjoy on 24.11.2011 at 20:18

Written by pisymbol on 24.11.2011 at 17:01
One poster's 5 is another poster's 8. Its the way of the Storm.
You either get it or you don't. You don't, no big deal. I read your other reviews of various albums and honestly, other than your definition of good thrash, I like a lot of what you seem to gravitate toward. As I said, you are at least consistent in your thrash (again, meant as a compliment).

I agree with the first part (tastes differ) and I appreciate the compliment, but I do have a problem with people saying I don't "get it". Thrash is pretty simple stuff, there isn't much to get. I might be misinterpreting what you meant by that though. Maybe you just meant I don't get it as in I don't "feel it" (which is basically just saying I don't like it) which I can agree with, but it's not a genre I don't understand.

Correction: You don't seem to enjoy the revivalist thrash bands. What's interesting is I would expect (as you pointed out) that you might like one revivalist style than others, but that's not true either. I think your overall sentiment on all of these releases is what garnered the "Troy, you don't really like thrash" comments. I can empathize a bit with the popular crowd this time! :-)

In any event, I have gone through Outer Isolation now three times and I'm pretty positive I enjoy it more than Black Future (I really need to buy the lossless copy than make do with Spotify).

I'm prolly 5 listens in and so far it's perfect!
It's going to be sad to watch it slowly fall through the rankings.....

Written by pazuzuovbabel on 21.11.2011 at 10:04

Well done Vektor, it continues the legacy of Black Future.

Well said.

And that's why we are bors.

Written by Guest on 26.11.2011 at 04:29

And that's why we are bors.

BOR FOR BOR

I like it a lot.

I've been waiting for this one for many moons!

Can anybody give me a link where to get this album from?I'm really interested in thrash metal and I want to check this band

Written by eyeofthebeholder on 27.11.2011 at 00:58
Can anybody give me a link where to get this album from?I'm really interested in thrash metal and I want to check this band

It goes against site policy to solicit for illegal download links, so I'm assuming you were asking for a Youtube video.

Aaaand I caved in and listened to this last night. Admittedly it's much better than most revivalist thrash bands...to the point I wouldn't necessarily label this as revivalist thrash, just contemporary thrash. Decent stuff, probably worth a high 6.

I haven't listened to this album yet but I found there debut album quite outstanding. In their debut they really nice injected some black metal influences in a thrash metal album. What also was nice about there debut was there ability to show emotion and create atmosphere. Especially accelerating universe is quite a top notch song. In my opinion accelerating universe was way better than the last Sodom album which has some good songs like Nothing Counts More Than Blood and God Bless You but sounded overall flat and boring to me. Black Future on the other hand was a pleasure to listen all the way through. Hexen, Savage Messiah and Warbringer also delivered some great albums.
For 80's Thrash bands I think Overkill, Destruction, Kreator and Megadeth are really doing a great job.

This things so addictive, it's been on repeat for a few days now and no signs of letting up.

Written by eyeofthebeholder on 27.11.2011 at 00:58

Can anybody give me a link where to get this album from?I'm really interested in thrash metal and I want to check this band

Its on Spotify and if you search the News section, the entire album is available online here.

EDIT: The CDs (I just bought the bundle) can be found on Heavy Artillery's oniline shop at this location.

what a beast of an album!

How has no one reviewed this yet? Come on Metal Storm, get your shit together and review the best thrash metal album of 2011 already!

Written by Whoblehwah on 28.11.2011 at 10:00

How has no one reviewed this yet? Come on Metal Storm, get your shit together and review the best thrash metal album of 2011 already!

it's better without a review. they dont seem to like the band. lol

Well, here I am, rating a thrash album 9..

The ironic thing is, if this album is given a negative review by a staff member, they will incur a similar wrath that many associate only with mainstream metal fanboys.

Written by Angelic Storm on 28.11.2011 at 14:23
if this album is given a negative review by a staff member, they will incur a similar wrath that many associate only with mainstream metal fanboys.

Written by Angelic Storm on 28.11.2011 at 14:23

The ironic thing is, if this album is given a negative review by a staff member, they will incur a similar wrath that many associate only with mainstream metal fanboys.

That's why you have guest reviews.

A bit off topic:

I do think that the rules regarding guest reviews should be relaxed a bit, i.e. If a staff reviews an album, then guest reviews should be reviewed/accepted/rejected at any time afterward. I do not think a multi-week wait should be imposed after a staffer reviews it. I think that would be a nice compromise for all.

Back ON topic:

This album is really cool! :-)

Written by pisymbol on 29.11.2011 at 00:21
I do think that the rules regarding guest reviews should be relaxed a bit, i.e. If a staff reviews an album, then guest reviews should be reviewed/accepted/rejected at any time afterward. I do not think a multi-week wait should be imposed after a staffer reviews it. I think that would be a nice compromise for all.

As far as I'm aware, that is already the way it works. The 3 month rule only applies if a staff member hasn't reviewed it. A guest reviewer is free to make a review any time after a staff member reviews it.

Written by Angelic Storm on 29.11.2011 at 02:42

Written by pisymbol on 29.11.2011 at 00:21
I do think that the rules regarding guest reviews should be relaxed a bit, i.e. If a staff reviews an album, then guest reviews should be reviewed/accepted/rejected at any time afterward. I do not think a multi-week wait should be imposed after a staffer reviews it. I think that would be a nice compromise for all.

As far as I'm aware, that is already the way it works. The 3 month rule only applies if a staff member hasn't reviewed it. A guest reviewer is free to make a review any time after a staff member reviews it.

Ah, great!