I'd love to see the charts section expanded on but I think similar suggestions were somewhat overlooked/ignored in the past.

We're in 2015 and there's still MySpace all over the web, for example in the suggestions section there's the link beside the name of the band. And the MySpace link is still one of the things asked when suggesting a band.

I think that nobody uses it anymore, specially the new formed bands.

Couldn't it be changed to something more useful, like the Facebook page (which is far more used), or similar?

Written by Kintu on 13.01.2015 at 01:52

We're in 2015 and there's still MySpace all over the web, for example in the suggestions section there's the link beside the name of the band. And the MySpace link is still one of the things asked when suggesting a band.

I think that nobody uses it anymore, specially the new formed bands.

Couldn't it be changed to something more useful, like the Facebook page (which is far more used), or similar?

its good idea, but seems only Ivan can fix it

Written by Bad English on 13.01.2015 at 02:49
seems only Ivan can fix it

Yep.

Written by Kintu on 13.01.2015 at 01:52

We're in 2015 and there's still MySpace all over the web, for example in the suggestions section there's the link beside the name of the band. And the MySpace link is still one of the things asked when suggesting a band.

I think that nobody uses it anymore, specially the new formed bands.

Couldn't it be changed to something more useful, like the Facebook page (which is far more used), or similar?

It's fixed now and Facebook is listed

Written by D.T. Metal on 13.01.2015 at 19:01

It's fixed now and Facebook is listed

Great! The system works!

Thanks for the celerity.

Can we have a 'Last Known Lineup' feature for split up bands like what MA has? Bands who are no longer active are a mess since EVERYONE gets tossed into the 'former musicians' category.

Written by Guest on 06.02.2015 at 23:53

Can we have a 'Last Known Lineup' feature for split up bands like what MA has? Bands who are no longer active are a mess since EVERYONE gets tossed into the 'former musicians' category.

in some way its good idea, but it will be job for Ivan as programing same time I like it
its like new brake up hiatus rule

keep band genre running, line uo running, not add it multiple times

Written by Guest on 06.02.2015 at 23:53

Can we have a 'Last Known Lineup' feature for split up bands like what MA has? Bands who are no longer active are a mess since EVERYONE gets tossed into the 'former musicians' category.

just now saw that ... let me get back to you on this one.

Written by Guest on 06.02.2015 at 23:53

Can we have a 'Last Known Lineup' feature for split up bands like what MA has? Bands who are no longer active are a mess since EVERYONE gets tossed into the 'former musicians' category.

It's implemented now !

Written by D.T. Metal on 22.03.2015 at 16:36

Written by Guest on 06.02.2015 at 23:53

Can we have a 'Last Known Lineup' feature for split up bands like what MA has? Bands who are no longer active are a mess since EVERYONE gets tossed into the 'former musicians' category.

It's implemented now !

just question , last know line up is based on running members what is now, or band split up who was in last line up according to years

if band splits up in 2014 but x member left in 2014 January and band splits up in 2014 December it still means running, and if we put band to end, it means x member who quit band in jan as part of last known line up? even technically he wasn't
what we do then?

Written by Bad English on 24.03.2015 at 16:42

just question , last know line up is based on running members what is now, or band split up who was in last line up according to years

if band splits up in 2014 but x member left in 2014 January and band splits up in 2014 December it still means running, and if we put band to end, it means x member who quit band in jan as part of last known line up? even technically he wasn't
what we do then?

hmmm, try to tick the "inexact" box next to the departure year and if this doesn't work then add it to the info text on the member. "left band in January of 2014"

Written by D.T. Metal on 24.03.2015 at 16:56

Written by Bad English on 24.03.2015 at 16:42

just question , last know line up is based on running members what is now, or band split up who was in last line up according to years

if band splits up in 2014 but x member left in 2014 January and band splits up in 2014 December it still means running, and if we put band to end, it means x member who quit band in jan as part of last known line up? even technically he wasn't
what we do then?

hmmm, try to tick the "inexact" box next to the departure year and if this doesn't work then add it to the info text on the member. "left band in January of 2014"

I see, it was example, what I was thinking of , cant find such band atm, but I believe they exist
it was more to future edits

Only band what came in my mind is Gates Of Slumber, bassist left, then short after band split up

Does deep purple - purple album should not have all [c: Deep Purple] cover tags?

Written by Bad English on 24.03.2015 at 22:21

Does deep purple - purple album should not have all [c: Deep Purple] cover tags?

Huh?

Written by psykometal on 25.03.2015 at 02:24

Written by Bad English on 24.03.2015 at 22:21

Does deep purple - purple album should not have all [c: Deep Purple] cover tags?

Huh?

shit
whitesnake I mean whitenskae new purple album

and did I post in suggestion thread? I mean band report---- sorry

How about in band for in year we can have inexact option as on line up
when there are no real knowledge when band was form in? like bio says in late 1999 early 2000 3 guys came and band was born ... something like this, when there are no real bio to back up form in ?

Could the ability to rate albums in your collection that aren't on the database be added? The same way you can rate featured albums from your collection page.

Written by M C Vice on 10.04.2015 at 14:26

Could the ability to rate albums in your collection that aren't on the database be added? The same way you can rate featured albums from your collection page.

and purpose of it is?

IMO Its not possible since there be to much proram job to King Ivan

Written by Bad English on 10.04.2015 at 14:45

Written by M C Vice on 10.04.2015 at 14:26

Could the ability to rate albums in your collection that aren't on the database be added? The same way you can rate featured albums from your collection page.

and purpose of it is?

Nothing important. Just thought it would be nice to put ratings next to them same as the featured albums. It would be purely cosmetic.

How about default line up option in split albums to all bands not only band what are used to add album?

@Birgit how about my old suggestion via PM like search label and filter only invisible bands same way as we do now,
visible
search invisible (where now all are mixed)

and how about 3th
search only invisible

Written by Bad English on 12.04.2015 at 19:43

How about default line up option in split albums to all bands not only band what are used to add album?

@Birgit how about my old suggestion via PM like search label and filter only invisible bands same way as we do now,
visible
search invisible (where now all are mixed)

and how about 3th
search only invisible

I think we can also overkill the search function. Where would the fun be if everything on here would be searchable.

Written by D.T. Metal on 19.04.2015 at 22:10

Written by Bad English on 12.04.2015 at 19:43

How about default line up option in split albums to all bands not only band what are used to add album?

@Birgit how about my old suggestion via PM like search label and filter only invisible bands same way as we do now,
visible
search invisible (where now all are mixed)

and how about 3th
search only invisible

I think we can also overkill the search function. Where would the fun be if everything on here would be searchable.

Only invisible bands is easier to take care of datebase , but version what we have is good as well

How about using blabbermouth source in news submission. its official since roadrunner runs that site, a label, so official source, why we can not use it in the news as source ?

Written by Bad English on 14.08.2015 at 23:14

How about using blabbermouth source in news submission. its official since roadrunner runs that site, a label, so official source, why we can not use it in the news as source ?

Roadrunner doesn't actually own or run the site. They let Blabbermouth use server space and they maintain the site on the tech side so the actual owner can just focus on his content.

Written by psykometal on 17.08.2015 at 18:53

Written by Bad English on 14.08.2015 at 23:14

How about using blabbermouth source in news submission. its official since roadrunner runs that site, a label, so official source, why we can not use it in the news as source ?

Roadrunner doesn't actually own or run the site. They let Blabbermouth use server space and they maintain the site on the tech side so the actual owner can just focus on his content.

but still its legit why we cant use it as source

Written by psykometal on 17.08.2015 at 18:53


Roadrunner doesn't actually own or run the site. They let Blabbermouth use server space and they maintain the site on the tech side so the actual owner can just focus on his content.

Actually Roadrunner does own it. At least they did before Warner bought Roadrunner.

Written by Bad English on 17.08.2015 at 19:05

Written by psykometal on 17.08.2015 at 18:53

Written by Bad English on 14.08.2015 at 23:14

How about using blabbermouth source in news submission. its official since roadrunner runs that site, a label, so official source, why we can not use it in the news as source ?

Roadrunner doesn't actually own or run the site. They let Blabbermouth use server space and they maintain the site on the tech side so the actual owner can just focus on his content.

but still its legit why we cant use it as source

How is Blabbermouth more legit than Metalsucks in that case?

Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 18.08.2015 at 11:52

]


How is Blabbermouth more legit than Metalsucks in that case?

because roadrunner own it or owned and news about line up, new albums, songs etc are accurate and thyrice did accept it