But it also speaks of "reasonable means" that platforms have to take. We can't legally ask for government ID, so it'll be interesting to find out what constitutes as "reasonable" under that bill.

That's one of the reasons why we're not affected by the DSA. It's interesting that Australia's legislation works with such wide and blurry definitions. It seems like you can subsummize almost anything under this definition.

63C (3) is interesting: "in determining whether the condition set out in subparagraph (1)(a)(i) is satisfied, disregard and of the following purposes: (a) the provision of advertising material on the service".

Not ALL or ANY of the following conditions. So it's unclear, at least to me, whether satisfying any of the conditions would make us affected.

For example, it says "For the purposes of this Act, 'age-restricted social media platform' means (a) an electronic service that satisfies the following conditions"

They apply similar definitions as the EU in their DSA. Although Australia's are a bit more blurry.

A cursory read of Section 63C of the Social Media Minimum Age bill leads me to the conclusion we're not affected by it.