I'm starting to think that for classic great bands eg. Motorhead, Maiden, aged 60+, it is better off for the members to do more albums and less shows.

Written by Sword_Chant on 12.07.2016 at 13:13

I'm starting to think that for classic great bands eg. Motorhead, Maiden, aged 60+, it is better off for the members to do more albums and less shows.

This band last good album was in 70's . First five was good one, Mainden lastest 2 sucks. What else Motorhead was OK
Bands at such age and rich bands cant write good music, so live performance is OK, but they need slow down, take a brake
Remember age, but same time Lemmy was happy, better go such way as disabled

Written by Bad English on 12.07.2016 at 14:01

Written by Sword_Chant on 12.07.2016 at 13:13

I'm starting to think that for classic great bands eg. Motorhead, Maiden, aged 60+, it is better off for the members to do more albums and less shows.

This band last good album was in 70's . First five was good one, Mainden lastest 2 sucks. What else Motorhead was OK
Bands at such age and rich bands cant write good music, so live performance is OK, but they need slow down, take a brake
Remember age, but same time Lemmy was happy, better go such way as disabled

I think Aerosmith's late 80s phase was decent, even though it was a sell-out. Maiden started to suck much earlier. Its just that their latest 2 albums have 0 good songs. Motorhead is Motorhead... even when they were average they never sucked. I have no clue how those grandpas from Rolling Stones can keep making world tours when they're over 70 and these guys collapse on stage barely in their 60s.

Maiden even ''sucked'' was metal and is metal, this is some pop rock now, non decent rocking songs, like I said first 5 is O, 90's those are just mtv songs and mtv somehow says they rocks, but they don't