Why are there votes on this when it hasn't been released yet?

Written by Ilham on 17.01.2015 at 18:16

Why are they votes on this when it hasn't been released yet?

Probs because someone got the original date wrong, and there are always people* who vote on albums they haven't heard yet, and then the album date gets put forward.

*morons

Written by [user id=4365] on 17.01.2015 at 18:19

Probs because someone got the original date wrong, and there are always people* who vote on albums they haven''t heard yet, and then the album date gets put forward.

*morons

Oh okay, I thought there was a glitch of some kind and I was the only one unable to vote. Thanksies.

Written by Ilham on 17.01.2015 at 18:21

Oh okay, I thought there was a glitch of some kind and I was the only one unable to vote. Thanksies.

I'm pretty sure you can still rate unreleased albums if you add them to your collection and rate them from there.

Written by Zap on 17.01.2015 at 19:08

I'm pretty sure you can still rate unreleased albums if you add them to your collection and rate them from there.

Didn't know. I only buy albums ten years after they're released, on flea markets, that's maybe why .

Didn't realise that would work. Neither voters has this in their collection though it seems.

Just added this and voted on "1-worst ever" but it said "error" in red letters so I guess it's what Joooooe said. I'm pretty sure you used to be able to do it that way though. Although they might have fixed it with all those people voting 10s on the unreleased Time album.

I find their music really dull and uninspired, but I just saw them open for Killswitch Engage and they played their absolute hearts out even though it was a small venue practically in a terrible city. They had by far the most aggressive and energetic performance of the night and the music actually sounded better live than in the studio.