Metal Storm logo
Mastodon - Emperor Of Sand review



Reviewer:
5.9

516 users:
7.87
Band: Mastodon
Album: Emperor Of Sand
Release date: March 2017


01. Sultan's Curse
02. Show Yourself
03. Precious Stones
04. Steambreather
05. Roots Remain
06. Word To The Wise
07. Ancient Kingdom
08. Clandestiny
09. Andromeda
10. Scorpion Breath
11. Jaguar God

Emperor Of Sand follows after Once More 'Round The Sun and The Hunter before it as a mixture of streamlined hard rock and periodic bursts of classic Mastodon fury, with a psychedelic alt-rock haze seeping into a few riffs. As with any Mastodon album, Emperor Of Sand houses some inspired musicianship now and then, especially from Brann Dailor, but in keeping with the band's recent trend, the album centers around less kinetic displays and aims for commercial heaviness.

Clearly Mastodon have been looking for a way to take the multifaceted proggy sludge sound that they helped define into the commercial realms, and while Once More 'Round The Sun hinted that The Hunter did not spell the end of classic and inventive Mastodon, Emperor Of Sand trips back into artless safety. The deadpan vocal delivery and generally unadorned instrumental tracks on "Show Yourself" and "Precious Stones" sound like they're setting up the album to be something that it isn't, or at least shouldn't be: a straightforward, indie-influenced singalong that doesn't go very far and criminally under-utilizes the immense musical talents this band possesses. Taken on their own, "Show Yourself" and "Precious Stones" are some of the least interesting songs in Mastodon's entire catalogue.

A couple of other songs throughout the album ("Ancient Kingdom," for example) fall back into a very standard and unadventurous method of songwriting that can feel disappointing when "Scorpion Breath" and "Steambreather" try so hard to pull the album back into the dynamic, progressive, and just plain impressive territory of Crack The Skye. "Scorpion Breath" even has some moments that sound like blackened stoner, which would be a great new avenue for Mastodon to pursue if they didn't spend so much time trying to strip layers off their sound. The usual bright, jangly guitar riffs and harmonized choruses paint a Mastodon sheen over some otherwise unremarkable, grungy, radio rock tracks, but without the heavy low end, dynamic song structures, and impassioned delivery of past albums, Emperor Of Sand lives up to its name: it's just a little sand castle compared to Blood Mountain.

Emperor Of Sand doesn't have a lot of new ideas; some of those ideas that are new to Mastodon aren't new to the rest of the world. I enjoyed this album a lot at first, but the initial appeal wears off after comparison with the band's older material, and there are only a few songs I could see myself revisiting after giving the album its requisite handful of full playthroughs.


Rating breakdown
Performance: 8
Songwriting: 5
Originality: 5
Production: 7





Written on 30.04.2017 by I'm the reviewer, and that means my opinion is correct.


Comments

Comments: 29   Visited by: 520 users
01.05.2017 - 00:07
RichardPickman

I agree somehow. It is not an album to grow with. The first song sounds a bit like the old days but then... Forgive me, but it feels like Metallica.
Loading...
01.05.2017 - 03:16
bloodwrage
Pagan Angel
Thanks for giving a grounded review of this. I saw a few other sites give good reviews to it, and I was left very disappointed after hearing some of the songs.
Loading...
01.05.2017 - 14:48
Auntie Sahar
Drone Empress
Whew lad, thanks for giving this one a sensible score, but.... get ready for some butthurt on this thread
----
I am the Magician and the Exorcist. I am the axle of the wheel, and the cube in the circle. “Come unto me” is a foolish word: for it is I that go.

~ II. VII
Loading...
01.05.2017 - 15:33
Rating: 7
Kuroboshi

I gave it a higher rating, but then again I only listened to it twice. Good review. Kind of happy I didn't listen to it more, as my rating probably would have dropped more.
Loading...
02.05.2017 - 00:44
nikarg

Spot on.
Loading...
02.05.2017 - 02:39
Rating: 8
Devil Eyes

Harsh man... harsh.

It's no Crack the Skye or Blood Mountain, but ifor me, it's at least a 7.
Loading...
02.05.2017 - 13:16
Rating: 8
Silent Creeper
Senile Veteran
The butthurt fanboy I am, I will try to attack your credibility by focusing only on the final rating of the review: You gave this album a 5.9, but you gave Babymetal - Metal Resistance a 9.0 and you gave Lulu from Metallica 7.4. !?!

I apologize for stooping to this level but my fanboyness was hurt.
Loading...
02.05.2017 - 14:05
Marcel Hubregtse
Grumpy Old Fuck
Written by Silent Creeper on 02.05.2017 at 13:16

The butthurt fanboy I am, I will try to attack your credibility by focusing only on the final rating of the review: You gave this album a 5.9, but you gave Babymetal - Metal Resistance a 9.0 and you gave Lulu from Metallica 7.4. !?!

I apologize for stooping to this level but my fanboyness was hurt.


And latest Sabaton even higher than that
----
Member of the true crusade against European Flower Metal

Yesterday is dead and gone, tomorrow is out of sight
Dawn Crosby (r.i.p.)
05.04.1963 - 15.12.1996

Loading...
02.05.2017 - 14:10
Fallen Ghost
Craft Beer Geek
Can't say I agree with this review, Precious Stones is awesome! Oh well, each person with their taste! I fully enjoy this album, I may think this is even better than OMRTS.

And I agree, I just cannot take anyone who gives Babymetal such a ridiculous score seriously..
Loading...
02.05.2017 - 15:46
Rating: 7
Zombie94

Not a bad album by any means but, as you say, definitely does not compare to older albums like Crack the Skye or Leviathan. It seems like Mastodon's best days are behind them. I sensed this when I saw them all the way back in 2011 live and they sucked compared to older footage I'd seen from when the first album came out. Maybe just bad chemistry within the band? Brent Hinds seems very uninterested and is a shitshow live.
Loading...
02.05.2017 - 17:52
Unhealer
Eclecticist
While the album doesn't mark Mastodon's return to greatness, I for one am glad that they are doing concept albums again. Unlike The Hunter (which had a lot of standalone great songs) and OMRTS (which had a few standalone great songs), there's something that goes beyond just the music in this one and I can feel the full album listens to be more rewarding.
All that said, yeah, it gets boring at some points and it is a really standard Mastodon album overall. It sits between 7 and 8 for me.
Loading...
02.05.2017 - 18:41
Rating: 6
BitterCOld
The Ancient One
Liked it more than SSUSMNT$$$, would score a 7, but need a few more listens. Loved the Sandcastle compared to Blood Mountain bit, though. great wordplay to illustrate the point
----
get the fuck off my lawn.

Beer Bug Virus Spotify Playlist crafted by Nikarg and I. Feel free to tune in and add some pertinent metal tunes!
Loading...
03.05.2017 - 04:05
Rating: 6
flightoficarus
Stamp Tramp
Glad to see another review that isn't just "ermagerd Mastodon album!!!"
----
Daily underground metal recommendations at Metal Trenches.
Listen to the Trench Talk podcast.
Loading...
03.05.2017 - 05:37
The Galactician

When I saw the score pre-read my initial thought was, "Hey, that seems unfair!"

Then I read your conclusion and said to myself, "Eh, that's totally me too."

While I would give it closer to a 7, I think you're pretty spot on overall. Some good moments on this album, and maybe it would be better were it a composed by a new band without a past to compare against, but that's not the case. It's a Mastodon record; a pretty ho-hum one comparatively speaking.
Loading...
03.05.2017 - 08:26
Rating: 8
Ace Frawley
The Spaceman
I enjoy this album, probably give it about a 7.7 rating.
----
The sun shines over The Fool...
Loading...
03.05.2017 - 09:04
Rating: 6
Cynic Metalhead
Paisa Vich Nasha
Written by flightoficarus on 03.05.2017 at 04:05

Glad to see another review that isn't just "ermagerd Mastodon album!!!"


You meant ermahgerd, right?!
Loading...
03.05.2017 - 15:39
Daniell
_爱情_
Written by Silent Creeper on 02.05.2017 at 13:16

You gave this album a 5.9, but you gave Babymetal - Metal Resistance a 9.0 and you gave Lulu from Metallica 7.4. !?!

Those 3 releases are completely different and comparing their rating is pointless.
Loading...
03.05.2017 - 19:28
Rating: 8
Silent Creeper
Senile Veteran
Written by Daniell on 03.05.2017 at 15:39

Written by Silent Creeper on 02.05.2017 at 13:16

You gave this album a 5.9, but you gave Babymetal - Metal Resistance a 9.0 and you gave Lulu from Metallica 7.4. !?!

Those 3 releases are completely different and comparing their rating is pointless.

Of course they are completely different if you are reffering to the musical style/(sub)genre and I am not comparing that, I am talking about their ratings which are meant to be some sort of standardised way of evaluating an album - therefore the comparison of ratings is possible, no matter the (sub)genre. If this would not be true then for example the whole top 200 albums chart on this site is utterly 'pointless' because it features so many releases that are 'completely different'.
Loading...
03.05.2017 - 20:40
Rating: 6
flightoficarus
Stamp Tramp
Written by Cynic Metalhead on 03.05.2017 at 09:04

Written by flightoficarus on 03.05.2017 at 04:05

Glad to see another review that isn't just "ermagerd Mastodon album!!!"


You meant ermahgerd, right?!


----
Daily underground metal recommendations at Metal Trenches.
Listen to the Trench Talk podcast.
Loading...
04.05.2017 - 02:28
Marcel Hubregtse
Grumpy Old Fuck
Written by Daniell on 03.05.2017 at 15:39

Written by Silent Creeper on 02.05.2017 at 13:16

You gave this album a 5.9, but you gave Babymetal - Metal Resistance a 9.0 and you gave Lulu from Metallica 7.4. !?!

Those 3 releases are completely different and comparing their rating is pointless.


No it is not pointless since scoring one of the worst albums ever (Lulu) i(objectvely speaking) than than this okay album is just ridiculous.
----
Member of the true crusade against European Flower Metal

Yesterday is dead and gone, tomorrow is out of sight
Dawn Crosby (r.i.p.)
05.04.1963 - 15.12.1996

Loading...
04.05.2017 - 02:28
Marcel Hubregtse
Grumpy Old Fuck
Written by Daniell on 03.05.2017 at 15:39

Written by Silent Creeper on 02.05.2017 at 13:16

You gave this album a 5.9, but you gave Babymetal - Metal Resistance a 9.0 and you gave Lulu from Metallica 7.4. !?!

Those 3 releases are completely different and comparing their rating is pointless.


No it is not pointless since scoring one of the worst albums ever (Lulu) i(objectvely speaking) than than this okay album is just ridiculous.
----
Member of the true crusade against European Flower Metal

Yesterday is dead and gone, tomorrow is out of sight
Dawn Crosby (r.i.p.)
05.04.1963 - 15.12.1996

Loading...
04.05.2017 - 06:21
Rating: 5
ScreamingSteelUS
Editor-in-Chief
Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 04.05.2017 at 02:28

Written by Daniell on 03.05.2017 at 15:39

Written by Silent Creeper on 02.05.2017 at 13:16

You gave this album a 5.9, but you gave Babymetal - Metal Resistance a 9.0 and you gave Lulu from Metallica 7.4. !?!

Those 3 releases are completely different and comparing their rating is pointless.


No it is not pointless since scoring one of the worst albums ever (Lulu) i(objectvely speaking) than than this okay album is just ridiculous.

How would you prove categorically, empirically, scientifically, unassailably that Lulu is "objectively speaking" one of the worst albums ever?
----
"Earth is small and I hate it" - Lum Invader

I'm the Agent of Steel.
Loading...
04.05.2017 - 08:45
Daniell
_爱情_
Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 04.05.2017 at 02:28

No it is not pointless since scoring one of the worst albums ever (Lulu) i(objectvely speaking) than than this okay album is just ridiculous.

You seem to have forgotten that no rating of an album is ever objective. You said it yourself, numerous times.
Loading...
04.05.2017 - 23:21
Rating: 6
Alex F
Slick Dick Rick
Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 04.05.2017 at 02:28

No it is not pointless since scoring one of the worst albums ever (Lulu) i(objectvely speaking) than than this okay album is just ridiculous.

No album is objectively better than another. Don't diminish someone's opinion by acting as if there's some objective metric by which you can measure quality of music.
Loading...
11.05.2017 - 05:40
Rating: 3
Dr. Strawberry

Finally, I loved ScreamingSteelUS !
Loading...
19.05.2017 - 22:04
Rating: 9
chaotica_mortis

I find this record to be a perfect synthesis of their older and newer styles. EoS is the culmination of everything they've tried injecting into their sound since The Hunter came out, and I'd say it easily stands up to the best of their older material.

The cancer / death sentence concept lends an extra weight to much of the album, and makes songs like "Roots Remain," "Ancient Kingdom," and "Jaguar God" not only stand out instrumentally, but vocally as well. This is probably Mastodon's catchiest album as far as the vocals go, but even though there are times that get a little too poppy ("Show Yourself" is the band's admitted radio single), the sludgiest of Mastodon's older work, the proggiest of their middle era, and the streamlined punch of their newer material all shows through in almost every song. There's a balance present that previous albums lacked; the band knows when to noodle, when to riff, when to groove, and when to get emotional. In the case of a couple of tracks, specifically "Jaguar God," they do a little bit of everything. With Brann Dailor cemented as the band's third vocalist, their range of vocal color, intensity, and delivery is so expansive that whatever feeling needs to be conveyed can be done so accurately.

I'll stop before this turns into a full review. To close, I'd like to mention my favorite songs: "Steambreather," "Ancient Kingdom," and "Clandestiny," the latter of which has one of the most outer-space bridges of any Mastodon song. The whole album is just so damn cool. As a fan of all of the band's work, I find that this one has a lot to be appreciated, and would easily give it an 8 out of 10. Totally respect differing opinions though, as Mastodon tend to be a pretty divisive band.
----
Life is too short to be doing things you don't love doing. - Bruce Dickinson

I don't see any boundaries between any of the art forms. I think they all interrelate completely. - David Bowie
Loading...
08.07.2019 - 16:09
pdepmcp

Based on MS votes, 5 is "NOT GOOD", 6 is "AVERAGE".
I think 5.9 is misleading. This is by no mean a less than average album, unless you compare it with the band's past.
It may not be the record to start with (or maybe it is, because it's a bit more easy listening than before, like the review says) if you want to get into Mastodon and can be disappointing for some fan, but It's for sure above the average of the genre for a general listener.
5.9 is out of context.

ps: where does the "7" to production come from?
Loading...
08.07.2019 - 16:39
Rating: 5
ScreamingSteelUS
Editor-in-Chief
Written by pdepmcp on 08.07.2019 at 16:09

Based on MS votes, 5 is "NOT GOOD", 6 is "AVERAGE".
I think 5.9 is misleading. This is by no mean a less than average album, unless you compare it with the band's past.
It may not be the record to start with (or maybe it is, because it's a bit more easy listening than before, like the review says) if you want to get into Mastodon and can be disappointing for some fan, but It's for sure above the average of the genre for a general listener.
5.9 is out of context.

I'm not entirely sure what you mean by this. An album always has to have context. It's true that some people will be coming to this album with no prior Mastodon experience and won't know how to process a review that judges Emperor of Sand based on other Mastodon albums, but many people reading this review will be Mastodon fans wanting to know how Emperor of Sand stacks up to Once More 'Round the Sun and The Hunter, so for that reason, and because I myself am a returning Mastodon fan, I thought it most sensible to review this album from the perspective of a familiar listener.

As for its quality to a "general listener," that's a very subjective thing, since we don't know what the exact "average" of the genre is or what context the "general listener" is bringing to the table. I gave it a 5.9 because I thought it was not quite "bad" but below average and not especially enjoyable to me at many points. I think that's a fair assessment.

Written by pdepmcp on 08.07.2019 at 16:09

ps: where does the "7" to production come from?

The production sounded fine. I'm no expert; all my promos are mp3s anyway, so my production score tends to be "good," "bad," or "whatever" more than a specific number I'm prepared to defend.
----
"Earth is small and I hate it" - Lum Invader

I'm the Agent of Steel.
Loading...
08.07.2019 - 21:08
Zap
Guest
I have come to really like this one lately. When it was released I would have ranked it at the bottom of their releases, along with The Hunter. Nowadays I think it's about on par with Once More Round The Sun.

It's the only 2010's Mastodon album that scratches some of my Crack The Skye itches. There are definitely some weaker tracks here (the ones mentioned in your review come to mind,) and overall it feels much more simple and radio friendly than CTS --some of the choruses are a bit too catchy-- but it more than makes up for it with its highlights; tasty riffs, Brann's signature amazing drumwork, some very satisfying heavier sections and to top it off this album has some of Brent's best solos.
Loading...

Hits total: 9900 | This month: 9