Posts: 5289  |
05.07.2017 - 20:34Rating: 8
Posts: 5289 
This is the first Warbringer album I have listened to and I am digging it. I definitely get a Voivod-esq vibe from it, very prog and technical sounding. Excellent review and thanks.
Loading...
|
Posts: 8278  |
Posts: 8278 
Written by tea[m]ster on 05.07.2017 at 20:34
This is the first Warbringer album I have listened to and I am digging it. I definitely get a Voivod-esq vibe from it, very prog and technical sounding. Excellent review and thanks.
Try the first four then as well. I think they are all better than this one.
Loading...
|
|
Posts: 390
|
I liked this album I think the rating is too low. But it's an opinion and if you hate the vocals then i completely understand. I'm the same way with some bands and can't get past it nor should I. You listen to what you like. I respect your opinion very much but I'd rate this album a solid 8. I like every song, it's a short album at 8 songs and I also like that. I have listened to it straight through probably 10 times and never once wanted to switch to a different album or skip a song. I also wasn't blown away hence the 8 rating. Not their best album but I don't think it's their worst either.
Loading...
|
Posts: 8278  |
Posts: 8278 
Written by UPDIRNS on 06.07.2017 at 01:58
I liked this album I think the rating is too low. But it's an opinion and if you hate the vocals then i completely understand. I'm the same way with some bands and can't get past it nor should I. You listen to what you like. I respect your opinion very much but I'd rate this album a solid 8. I like every song, it's a short album at 8 songs and I also like that. I have listened to it straight through probably 10 times and never once wanted to switch to a different album or skip a song. I also wasn't blown away hence the 8 rating. Not their best album but I don't think it's their worst either.
I don't really disagree with you, it didn't feel like a chore to listen to the whole thing more than 30 times in order to write the review and I also like the fact that it is short and doesn't drag. My main problems with it were the vocals and the production. However, 6.8 is nearly 7, which means "good", and it could go up to 7.8 (practically very good) depending on how much someone likes the vocals.  I appreciate the feedback mate!
Loading...
|
Posts: 64506  |
Posts: 64506 
I have same this band did not talk to me, just it took so many years before I even was able get into it, I was stick whit classic, this is more a bit influencal, more influences
----
I stand whit Ukraine and Israel. They have right to defend own citizens.
Stormtroopers of Death - "Speak English or Die"

I better die, because I never will learn speek english, so I choose dieing
Loading...
|
Posts: 133  |
Posts: 133 
Good review. I too feel the final score is a little low, but I like the vocals. I've been listening to this for a week now and it doesn't get old. Warbringer has a new fan.
Loading...
|
Posts: 2574  |
11.07.2017 - 15:11Rating: 10
Posts: 2574 
If your problem with the album is production, then you need to check your equipment or sound source (files/CD whatever) because the sound on this album is just spot-on. I also don't how can one not like John Kevill. I mean he is probably the best thrash vocalist out there.
When you are talking about songs, you highlight "Remain Violent" and "Divinity of Flesh" as "something different" but completely leave out "Spectral Asylum" and "When the Guns Fell Silent." And what about the ending of "Descending Blade?" How smart is that?
This review sucks, not because I disagree, but because it's not substantiated enough or, at times, plain wrong (lol at "risk-free"). I am writing my own soon!
----
Savor what you feel and what you see
Things that may not seem important now
But may be tomorrow
R.I.P. Chuck Schuldiner
Satan was a Backstreet Boy
Loading...
|
Posts: 8278  |
Posts: 8278 
Written by K✞ulu on 11.07.2017 at 15:11
This review sucks, not because I disagree
Yes, it's obvious.
Loading...
|
Posts: 72  |
11.07.2017 - 22:28Rating: 9
Posts: 72 
My first Warbringer album. 8/10
Loading...
|
Posts: 1689  |
13.07.2017 - 01:49Rating: 6
Posts: 1689 
Well, this is underwhelming compared to their previous albums.
----
"Les vers savent qu'ils n'ont pas d'ailes, c'est pour cela qu'ils se cachent sous terre"
Loading...
|
Posts: 8278  |
Posts: 8278 
Written by K✞ulu on 11.07.2017 at 15:11
If your problem with the album is production, then you need to check your equipment or sound source (files/CD whatever) because the sound on this album is just spot-on. I also don't how can one not like John Kevill. I mean he is probably the best thrash vocalist out there.
Found the time for a detailed reply. Production is indeed one of my problems. The files used were 320kbps mp3 files provided by the band/label for the purpose of reviewing the album, so nothing wrong there. The equipment used is a pair of Sennheiser headphones, a Bose soundsystem in my car and a 5-speaker Sony soundsystem at home. All of them are used for every review. In this album, when the volume is turned up, the sound becomes a wall of noise, plain and simple. The argument "how can one not like John Kevill" is as legit as if someone said "how can you not like Reign In Blooood man? Fuckin' Slayeeeeer!!!". It's a good argument if you are less than 15 years old, but I'm way past that age and you are too. If you are such a big fan of Kevill, fine, it means that the score would be 7.8 and this is definitely the highest rating this album should get.
Written by K✞ulu on 11.07.2017 at 15:11
When you are talking about songs, you highlight "Remain Violent" and "Divinity of Flesh" as "something different" but completely leave out "Spectral Asylum" and "When the Guns Fell Silent." And what about the ending of "Descending Blade?" How smart is that?
I'm not highlighting "Remain Violent" as different, but as a fantastic classic thrash song. So maybe you should read again. I left out "Spectral Asylum" and "Descending Blade", because they are not special to me. I did not completely leave out "When The Guns Fell Silent", instead I am writing that "the album's closer is also a nice surprise, being a progressive and epic thrash effort". Newsflash: "When The Guns Fell Silent" is the album's closer. So how smart is it to comment on a review, if you haven't really read it properly first?
Written by K✞ulu on 11.07.2017 at 15:11
This review sucks, not because I disagree, but because it's not substantiated enough or, at times, plain wrong (lol at "risk-free"). I am writing my own soon!
This review may suck indeed, but not because it's not substantiated enough. If you laughed out loud with the statement that " Woe To The Vanquished doesn't sound much like its predecessor, being more straightforward and risk-free", please enlighten me in regard to the risks the band has taken compared to the previous album (which was indeed risky). As a final note, it's fine to disagree man, but ffs read first.
Loading...
|
Posts: 2437  |
29.12.2017 - 15:07Rating: 8
Posts: 2437 
Nice review, i also liked a lot, their previous album. This one is their most boring to date. Not bad.. but all their other albums were better.
----
Υou've sold your human essence to the cold world of dead and empty things... You're SOLD!
Loading...
|
Posts: 9576  |
Posts: 9576 
I agree the production on this album is trash. The vocals are WAY too high in the mix.
Loading...
|
VIG
Account deleted
|
VIG
Account deleted
Its been a long time since I have heard anything by this band. I need to re-visit their previous albums.
Loading...
|