@corrupt: What's misogynistic in "innocent until proven guilty" rule? 'Cos I clearly missed this thread ;)

@Starvynth A terrorist is a terrorist. I hastily called him a muslim because he's a Saudi who fit a very very long pattern. That's a safe assumption to make. What I don't get is why anyone would defend him from such assumptions.

In fact, I would appreciate if we didn't have to have the same smoke bomb discussion every single time. If you don't have anything meaningful to contribute, at least try not to derail.

when you are clearly covering your eyes and ears in the process while crying whataboutism.

@Chidder, we've been through this. All the information you need is in the respective threads. If you choose to be misogynistic about it, that's your thing. But nobody here will spend any more time trying to educate you

You hastily called him a Muslim, but it turned out he’s an anti-Islam atheist. If you can’t see that these are two complete opposites, I can’t help you.

@Starvynth Not the complete opposite, just one word removed. He's still a terrorist piece of shit, and jumping to defend this terrorist piece of shit from "racism" is nonsense.