Written by [user id=4365] on 20.11.2013 at 20:14

Sorry, I'm not going to buy into your circular bating. The evidence is there, I'm not going to break down every single point I make just so you can stretch this debate ad infinitum.

I just ever comment containing the word good. You have provided zero evidence. To summarise your argument you stated that simply because good is not a synonym for "uninspired" and "forced" it cannot be concomitant with those terms. Good is not a mutual antonym for the others either.

Quote:

Actually, if you notice, I used the term prescriptively: "which no matter how much argumentum ad nauseam you commit yourself to" because I understand your one and only debating tool is indeed argumentum ad nauseam; to continue to draw out the same circular points, using the "I've shown all the proof I need" tropes combined with the same proofless points with no evidence to show for it. I said it in an effort to try to stop you doing exactly what you're doing right now so clearly I failed. You are the very definition of argumentum ad nauseam and prove so with every pointless response designed to leach out every detail by going back an forth again and again without actually admitting your judgements were incorrect. Quite frankly, you're a farce when it comes to the idea of debate. You can take that how you want as I simply have no respect for someone of your calibre.

They would be circular if you addressed them and gave sufficient evidence to impel me to discontinue arguing the point; you, however, did not as I have shown above. I find that comical coming from you, considering that during my entire experience on this website discussing with you, you have continuously failed to address my points, proceeding to make contradictory responses. I am forced to reiterate my arguments as a result of your incompetence.

Quote:

You're confusing argumentum ad nauseam with simply "ad nauseam". The entire idea of a logical fallacy is to point out when someone is using logic fallaciously. Ascribing logical fallacies as an emotion attack is to misunderstand the term, which you consistently do with every response about it.

Once again you've used the term "I'm well aware you went out of your way to find a definition that suited your needs" once again a proofless point. The burden of proof lies on you to prove these things. Saying you're "well aware" is not proof.

As I said before your use of argumentum ad nauseam was invalid if not from an emotional perspective. Suggesting that your accusation was devoid of emotion suggests that you believe I was reasserting my argument to "make it true" when, in truth, had you acknowledged my claims, as is commonplace in traditional debates, then I would not have had to reiterate my arguments. Still no proof of my argument's invalidity.

Written by LeKiwi on 20.11.2013 at 20:32

They would be circular if you addressed them and gave sufficient evidence to impel me to discontinue arguing the point; you, however, did not as I have shown above.

I'm just going to let the autistic donkey end this for me. I can't think of a more appropriate appraisal for you to be honest.

Written by [user id=4365] on 20.11.2013 at 20:39

I'm just going to let the autistic donkey end this for me. I can't think of a more appropriate appraisal for you to be honest.

Weeeeeeeeell done, you've shown your true colours. I commend you I knew I wasn't the one lacking debating skills

It seems we are fated to reach an identical conclusion in every instance of our discussions; your forfeit as a result of your inability to prove your baseless claims, failure to acknowledge my arguments, and the (likely) subsequent emotional distress as evinced by your overt insults.

I'm aware that my arguments cannot be proved either, but at least they're plausible.

If you ask me: You BOTH are a fucking joke.

Now, I better check this album out and contribute with an on-topic comment.

Written by X-Ray Rod on 20.11.2013 at 21:13

If you ask me: You BOTH are a fucking joke.

Now, I better check this album out and contribute with an on-topic comment.

I take full responsibility. I should know that arguing with asperger's sufferers is an impossible task as I've done it in real life to the same effect

For the change of mood and adding a bit of humor to the whole conversations ; I see some principles of absurd literature here, people talk but they don't communicate On topic ? well after I heard the album I would let you know.

I'll agree with the first comment, feels forced and unispired. If I heard it, without knowing the name of the band, I'ld bet that it was Borknagar.

And oh my god, that's some off topic right there