It's ok. Kind of nice from an aesthetic point of view, ugly as sin from a subject matter perspective though.

Probably one of their best covers, although that isn't saying much.

Written by [user id=4365] on 17.04.2014 at 16:56
Kind of nice from an aesthetic point of view, ugly as sin from a subject matter perspective though.

I don't understand what you wrote. D:

Written by X-Ray Rod on 17.04.2014 at 17:25

I don't understand what you wrote. D:

I meant that the design style is nice, but the actual picture, the warped head thing, is fugly =P

It'll look good on CD cover.

Better than the crow on SOAPF IMO!

Written by BloodJuNkie on 17.04.2014 at 17:50

Better than the crow on SOAPF IMO!

A matser of taste, I like that crow That CD artwork is nice too but what matters most is the content of the album

Written by s_t_s on 17.04.2014 at 18:15

Written by BloodJuNkie on 17.04.2014 at 17:50

Better than the crow on SOAPF IMO!

A matter of taste, I like that crow That CD artwork is nice too but what matters most is the content of the album

Well, i'm not very optimistic to be honest .. I just hope it be better than their last 2 releases!

Wow! They went back to their previous band logo, that's a shock. Actually interested in hearing this now.

Awesome cover, i don't know what it means but it looks beautiful

Written by jesterhead57 on 17.04.2014 at 19:10

Wow! They went back to their previous band logo, that's a shock. Actually interested in hearing this now.

Could you really call that a logo? As much as the type face for the last sentence I typed could be a logo for a band called "Could you really call that a logo", if you get what I mean...

As far as my thoughts on the artwork, it looks pretty run of the mill to me. Not very interesting.

Written by Mattybu on 17.04.2014 at 20:01

Could you really call that a logo? As much as the type face for the last sentence I typed could be a logo for a band called "Could you really call that a logo", if you get what I mean...

I don't think logos require a certain level of complexity to be considered logos. But, I see what you mean. I like this logo much better than the one they used on "A Sense of Purpose" and "Sounds of a Playground Fading".

Written by jesterhead57 on 17.04.2014 at 20:14

Written by Mattybu on 17.04.2014 at 20:01

Could you really call that a logo? As much as the type face for the last sentence I typed could be a logo for a band called "Could you really call that a logo", if you get what I mean...

I don't think logos require a certain level of complexity to be considered logos. But, I see what you mean. I like this logo much better than the one they used on "A Sense of Purpose" and "Sounds of a Playground Fading".

Well I agree they don't necessarily need complexity. A lot actually suffer from trying to be too complex. I personally think it needs to be a little more unique than a font off microsoft word to form an affiliation with a particular band though, haha. Agreed about the other logo though, always got a crappy teen angst vibe from that one.

Certainly the most beautiful cover for their album, it's simple but effective

I hope someone genuinely hacks their website now. I genuinely can't stand marketing tricks like that.

Written by [user id=4365] on 17.04.2014 at 17:37

I meant that the design style is nice, but the actual picture, the warped head thing, is fugly =P

hahaha, yep, agree with that. Fugly is the word. Might have been nice if the warped head thing was a sexy-looking siren instead.

Written by Ace Frawley on 17.04.2014 at 23:59


hahaha, yep, agree with that. Fugly is the word. Might have been nice if the warped head thing was a sexy-looking siren instead.

That would have been my preference too. I suppose though sirens are supposed to be ugly only they fog the minds of sailors into thinking they're hot, or something. Still though, I'd rather have my mind fogged i think.

Written by [user id=142921] on 18.04.2014 at 07:46

Is it sad that it reminded of Demon of Song?

Haha, Demon of Song is perhaps a little better looking than that thing

Written by Mattybu on 17.04.2014 at 23:06

Well I agree they don't necessarily need complexity. A lot actually suffer from trying to be too complex. I personally think it needs to be a little more unique than a font off microsoft word to form an affiliation with a particular band though, haha. Agreed about the other logo though, always got a crappy teen angst vibe from that one.

Lets just hope the music follows suit!

Not Bad..

Like it. Waiting for some music now

Written by [user id=28338] on 17.04.2014 at 22:49

Written by Lord_Agony on 17.04.2014 at 19:21

Awesome cover, i don't know what it means but it looks beautiful

I think, it depicts a siren, it reminds me of Come Clarity though, probably it's from the same artist.

Come clarity was done by Derek Hess, i'm not sure about this one but it doesn't have his style
I have this theory that their covers don't mean a thing, they just keep you wondering

I'm not hating on the band, but the last two releases I really struggled to get into. I'm not slating their new material, as there are parts I enjoy, but I really do prefer the style of their earlier works. So I won't be raising my hopes too high for this album, the cover looks good, but really the songwriting and direction matters just as much

Looks like something from Come Clarity IMO

Written by [user id=4365] on 17.04.2014 at 16:56

It's ok. Kind of nice from an aesthetic point of view, ugly as sin from a subject matter perspective though.

This comment was right into the point. Well-written.