I did not include ''both sucks'' option and Immortal is not ''welcome here''
Both are Immortal musician side projects, both play similar music, nature, mountains, Norway, more melodic staff, less growlish vocals, more ''Viking'' ,metal

I like both, but little more I swing to I direction, more complicated lyrics and it was 1th from those 2, both bands has ''similar'' line up only different vocalist, if I wont know details I would thought it is same band, but it isn't, 2 different, but same time simmilar.

I vote both. Because my argument what make think I is better is to week to say I is winner , maybe in OT whit OT winning goal, but not big score, so its equal and demonaz is not so bad at all to reject, so I vote for bith

I. There's a reason Abbath is Immortal's vocalist, not Demonaz.

Written by M C Vice on 07.07.2013 at 06:04

I. There's a reason Abbath is Immortal's vocalist, not Demonaz.

Good point, but Demonaz vocals was not so week, then lyrics and all mussican conecpt was
Bit Abboth is way better

I actually prefer Demonaz's stuff

I prefer Demonaz, to me it has an icy atmosphere which I like quite a bit.
I like I as well but just not as much as Demonaz.

Both are incredibly weak and generic. Immortal shits over both.

Written by [user id=101272] on 11.07.2013 at 21:46

Both are incredibly weak and generic. Immortal shits over both.

in some way but same time it means Immortal is lil diferent BM band then other, somehow it stand in diferent place in BM map
in those 2 bands, well mussicxal its diferent then immortal but lyricaly, even also it is litle bit diferent