Written by Troy Killjoy on 14.08.2012 at 05:32
Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 14.08.2012 at 04:17
And like Craig said hardcore actually is way more extreme.
I might have misinterpreted what he said, but I think he meant hardcore is more extreme than melodic metal (a la power metal, prog, etc.) not that hardcore is more extreme than grindcore.
In any case, I'd argue against it anyway. Grindcore is clearly a more extreme genre, kind of like how brutal death metal is more extreme than traditional death metal, or how funeral doom is more extreme than traditional doom. It may be an offshoot of an original genre but that doesn't make it any less extreme.
yeah, i was comparing Hard Core/Hard Core Punk against the bulk of what sits in the Melodic section of the forum.
and at the time it originated it was the extreme in music, much the way that grindcore upped the ante.
i still find it hilarious people are dismissive of it simply because the way extreme music has continually tried to push boundaries... although from my perspective it hasn't really changed much over the last 20 years. i think the jump from radio to Punk/Hard Core and the jump from that to Grind/Death/Black by the early 90s was far more significant than any since.
sure the acts now are more extreme variants, but nothing hit me like the first time i heard Suicidal in '85 or the first time i heard Napalm Death in '91. those completely etcha-sketched my views on what was extreme music. after that it's sort of a matter of swell variations or boring derivations.
having listened through early versions of both, it all falls back to that "experience/age" thing that shows up on other threads. witnessing it from A->B->C->D gives a completely different perspective and appreciation from jumping in at point D and checking out the rest in the rearview mirror.
and unless metal somehow manages to change in some drastic and new direction, it's one our "younger" (in metal years) contributors won't experience.