- Add video
Error!
You need to be logged in to edit videos.
Phrenelith
Post New Track
Post New Track
Jan 25
Page: 1
››
Nobody you say? Insincere reading you say? "The DA reviewed sworn testimony of witnesses and claimants that contradicted the claims they made. Including Smithline (…)".
19:36 - ScreamingSteelUS
Nobody was proven to be lying, Chidder. That is not the reason why the charges were not filed, and that is an alarmingly insincere reading of this situation.
19:35 - corrupt
I give up. Have fun in Neverland.
19:34 - Chidder
Lying witness is not a technicailty. Lying accuser is also not a technicailty. It's not like someone made a mistake in the application and the case was dismissed.
19:32 - ScreamingSteelUS
prosecute. But there is not *no* evidence. What is your goal in celebrating this, anyway? What is the point you intend to prove by laughing at Manson's accusers being unable to take this to trial?
19:31 - corrupt
Wait, now you're pulling formalities? So if someone rapes your daughter but is then cleared on a technicailty, the rape never happened? Is that how "the law works"?
19:30 - ScreamingSteelUS
It is absolutely untrue that there was *no* evidence - there was a huge amount of evidence. It was not considered sufficient to win a conviction, which, again, was also to do with the fact that too much time had passed to
Guests: 1035
|
