Hamird Lieutenant
Posts: 2564 |
29.06.2008 - 22:13Rating: 6
Totally agree...
Loading...
|
Uirapuru Liver Failure
Posts: 2955 |
Before I listen to the album I've never thought that I would agree with the review.
Your absolutly right, it is just ''mindless violence'', there is no meaning, feeling or artistic message. Nothing. The song titles sucks, ''Mad at God''?!?! Whata hell!
But the unoriginal and stupid theme would'nt matter if the music was ok. It's all the same thing, a repeated amount of riffs and drums with a nice vocalist.
The analogy with the ''Cannibal's'' movies fitted very well. Holocaust is a classic, I didn't watch Ferox, but it looks like I should stay away.
----
----
member of the true crusade against old school heavy metal, early 80s thrash, NWOBHM, traditional doom, first and second wave black metal, old school death metal, US power metal, 70s prog rock and atmospheric doomsludgestoner. o/
Loading...
|
Hamird Lieutenant
Posts: 2564 |
19.05.2009 - 11:26Rating: 6
Written by Uirapuru on 25.04.2009 at 20:34
Before I listen to the album I've never thought that I would agree with the review.
Your absolutly right, it is just ''mindless violence'', there is no meaning, feeling or artistic message. Nothing. The song titles sucks, ''Mad at God''?!?! Whata hell!
But the unoriginal and stupid theme would'nt matter if the music was ok. It's all the same thing, a repeated amount of riffs and drums with a nice vocalist.
The analogy with the ''Cannibal's'' movies fitted very well. Holocaust is a classic, I didn't watch Ferox, but it looks like I should stay away.
Cannibal Holocaust is a piece of horror art.. But Cannibal Ferox is one of the most meaningless and stupid horror movies that you would ever seen.
Loading...
|
Cryzpin
Posts: 113 |
The album really sucks, but to say "Deicide is what gives Death Metal a bad name." puts authors opinion at the same level = simplistic and full of shit.
Loading...
|
vezzy Stallmanite
Posts: 3493 |
29.07.2010 - 15:21Rating: 7
vezzyStallmanitePosts: 3493
Written by Cryzpin on 29.07.2010 at 15:13
The album really sucks, but to say "Deicide is what gives Death Metal a bad name." puts authors opinion at the same level = simplistic and full of shit.
It's a six year old review, his opinion has probably changed.
----
Licensed under the GPLv3.
Relinquish proprietary software for a greater GNU/America.
Loading...
|
jupitreas hi-fi / lo-life StaffPosts: 6659 |
Written by vezzy on 29.07.2010 at 15:21
Written by Cryzpin on 29.07.2010 at 15:13
The album really sucks, but to say "Deicide is what gives Death Metal a bad name." puts authors opinion at the same level = simplistic and full of shit.
It's a six year old review, his opinion has probably changed.
This particular album by Deicide is still what gives DM a bad name and AT THE TIME when this was released, it seemed like there was no way Deicide could improve at this point. But they did and I even reviewed the EP that marked their improvement. All things exist in some kind of context.
Loading...
|
Angelic Storm Melodious
Posts: 6675 |
29.07.2010 - 16:20Rating: 8
Written by [user id=28338] on 29.07.2010 at 15:35 me too horrible albums along with In Torment In Hell.
IMO those two albums are poles apart in quality. "In Torment In Hell" is undoubtedly the worst album Deicide ever made. There's not a single memorable song on it. Its extremely boring to listen to. "Scars Of The Crucifix" is a far better album, with better riffs, and catchier songs. There is some filler, but the good songs are classic Deicide. There's not a single song on ITIH that Id class as great, or memorable. Even "Incinerathymn" had a small amount of good moments. ITIH has none whatsoever.
To those moaning about the lyrics, geez its Deicide for crying out loud, what do you expect? lol
Loading...
|
Cryzpin
Posts: 113 |
Written by jupitreas on 29.07.2010 at 15:45
Written by vezzy on 29.07.2010 at 15:21
Written by Cryzpin on 29.07.2010 at 15:13
The album really sucks, but to say "Deicide is what gives Death Metal a bad name." puts authors opinion at the same level = simplistic and full of shit.
It's a six year old review, his opinion has probably changed.
This particular album by Deicide is still what gives DM a bad name and AT THE TIME when this was released, it seemed like there was no way Deicide could improve at this point. But they did and I even reviewed the EP that marked their improvement. All things exist in some kind of context.
Well, now it's "This particular album by Deicide is..." while in review the statement was "Deicide is what gives Death Metal a bad name." - see the difference right?
Is it really neccessary for fans to kick in the falling band and spit on them when they have crossed the peak, lost the vision (Legion), get older and just try to make some more money? Btw >50% of all bands in extreme music goes this way.
Loading...
|
Angelic Storm Melodious
Posts: 6675 |
30.07.2010 - 13:10Rating: 8
Written by Cryzpin on 30.07.2010 at 12:10 Is it really neccessary for fans to kick in the falling band and spit on them when they have crossed the peak, lost the vision (Legion), get older and just try to make some more money? Btw >50% of all bands in extreme music goes this way.
"Scars Of The Crucifix" is no "Legion", but its definitely a good album, and easily their best since "Serpents Of The Light".
Loading...
|
jupitreas hi-fi / lo-life StaffPosts: 6659 |
Written by Cryzpin on 30.07.2010 at 12:10
Written by jupitreas on 29.07.2010 at 15:45
Written by vezzy on 29.07.2010 at 15:21
Written by Cryzpin on 29.07.2010 at 15:13
The album really sucks, but to say "Deicide is what gives Death Metal a bad name." puts authors opinion at the same level = simplistic and full of shit.
It's a six year old review, his opinion has probably changed.
This particular album by Deicide is still what gives DM a bad name and AT THE TIME when this was released, it seemed like there was no way Deicide could improve at this point. But they did and I even reviewed the EP that marked their improvement. All things exist in some kind of context.
Well, now it's "This particular album by Deicide is..." while in review the statement was "Deicide is what gives Death Metal a bad name." - see the difference right?
Is it really neccessary for fans to kick in the falling band and spit on them when they have crossed the peak, lost the vision (Legion), get older and just try to make some more money? Btw >50% of all bands in extreme music goes this way.
As I said, back in 2004, the original statement made sense since there was no indication that the band was going to rebound.
Also - poor, sensitive Mr. Benton
Loading...
|
Deadmeat Necrobutcher
Posts: 2437 |
20.08.2010 - 14:24Rating: 8
Well i disagree with the review. this album is not a piece of shit. it has some nice songs, as "scars of the crucifix" and "conquered by sodom" (i know you've mentioned them, but i say these these 2 songs imoo are good and not only acceptable). also: yeah, deicide is all about "100000 ways to fuck god from the ass" but come on they are not scary cause they werent scary imo. they have never been scary. what is shocking about them is imo some of their album covers as the one in "once upon the cross". and right, deicide in this album are not on their best but really this album is not that awfull. at least i enjoyed it fairly enough. it is not a masterpiece, it doesnt have anything new to offer but it is deicide. it's exactly these same thing that slayer fan say: "it's fucking slayer, what would you expect?"...
----
Υou've sold your human essence to the cold world of dead and empty things... You're SOLD!
Loading...
|
Baz Anderson StaffPosts: 13254 |
A bit of mindless violence is what I look for in music sometimes.
Still, other bands have done it better than this album - although this is one of my favourites of Decide.
Loading...
|
Haiwaan Das
Posts: 84 |
Actually, in the first Round with songs like "Scars of Cruxifix" I thought it would be hell of a boxing match, but Jesus Knocked Benton FLAAAT as the song "Mad at God" starts.
----
Gr Gr Gr Gr Gr
Loading...
|
Moosh666
Posts: 132 |
Written by [user id=28338] on 29.07.2010 at 17:15
Written by Angelic Storm on 29.07.2010 at 16:20
Written by [user id=28338] on 29.07.2010 at 15:35 me too horrible albums along with In Torment In Hell.
IMO those two albums are poles apart in quality. "In Torment In Hell" is undoubtedly the worst album Deicide ever made. There's not a single memorable song on it. Its extremely boring to listen to. "Scars Of The Crucifix" is a far better album, with better riffs, and catchier songs. There is some filler, but the good songs are classic Deicide. There's not a single song on ITIH that Id class as great, or memorable. Even "Incinerathymn" had a small amount of good moments. ITIH has none whatsoever.
To those moaning about the lyrics, geez its Deicide for crying out loud, what do you expect? lol
I hate also the -core breakdown riffs in Scars Of The Crucifix.
Breakdowns have been around well before coreshit you ignorant dumbass, try listening to Suffocation or some Morbid Angel songs and fucking say that again.
Loading...
|
belphegor666
Posts: 33 |
Fuck the reviews...i don't give a damn what the reviews are saying ? you know how many good albums i lost because of the reviews??? countless. For me this album is a grinder...not a piece of shit... DEICIDE fucking rules ...
Loading...
|