Religion: Double Standards
|
Original post
Posted by APOHAKC, 08.04.2008 - 15:49
Now to the point, in every day life I see a lot things and contradictories that are pissing me off, whole idea for a thread came when I saw Dutch movie Fitna, you probably already heard about it, it is about Islam, scenarist was accused for hate speech while movie is called racist?! (since when religion and race are connected) and hateful. In the movie, they put strong anti-muslim accent, doesn't matter does I support or not whole concept of the movie, to sum it up, man that made a movie was literally impaled in the media because of the whole project.
Also, we have a bunch of movies that never ever got permission to be shown on tv about anti-judaism, (and please do not invert my words, anti-judaism and anti-semitism is not one the same), they were immediately shown as racist and hateful in the media, not rarely people were even imprisoned for making them.
Now, we have a bunch of anti-Christian movies on tv, that no one never ever bash as racist, that are shown daily on tv, no one ever question religious correctness of those movies, truth, mostly Christian by birth made those movies, but again, as someone declare himself as an anti-Christian what difference does it makes?
Question is, WHY is it ok to bash on Christianity and it is NOT ok to bash on any other religion and immediately it is characterized as hateful speech?
Examples in music, Ukrainian band Nokturnal Mortum had both anti-judaistic and anti-Christian lyrics, no one ever question anti-Christian part cause that's ok, but everyone bitch about anti-judaism?! What's with that?
80% of you are openly anti-Christian, and bash on Christianity on this forum and real life most probably, same as some metalstormers I know, once, I said to one member in real life damn they want to build stupid mosque in the middle of the town and he looked at me like that I said Gods knows what and told me don't be a racist (again?!), but never ever he said anything to me when I dozens of times said that Cathedral in the center of the town should be burned? (yeah, a little of trve metal behavior..)
Once on this forum member said to other member stop with you judaistic crap, I remember that very well, post was deleted and he got warned for racism again, but I also saw DOZENS of time members saying similar things like stop your Christian crap to other members and no one ever got warned for that.
Why is it ok to bitch about Christianity and it is blasphemy to bitch about all other organized religions (especially Islam and Judaism)?!?
Looks like a double standard to me...
Dane Train Beers & Kilts Elite |
20.07.2008 - 15:59 Written by Twilight on 20.07.2008 at 13:43 I would say even more than that is Christian philosophy has much to do with it. Jesus taught us not to let our emotions completely control us and to "turn the other cheek".
---- (space for rent)
Loading...
|
Twilight IntepridTraveler |
20.07.2008 - 21:46
Oh yeah that's right, I remember that. One of the philosophies that not many Christian-haters know of.
Loading...
|
Dane Train Beers & Kilts Elite |
20.07.2008 - 23:33 Written by Twilight on 20.07.2008 at 21:46 Yet few people actually understand what the philosophy of turning the other cheek actually means.
---- (space for rent)
Loading...
|
TOUGHEST MEMBER |
21.07.2008 - 19:16
Satanism states the opposite, maybe it is so because it takes from Christianity. Dont remember what it is called but it states: Revenge instead of turning the other cheek.
Loading...
|
APOHAKC The Bard |
26.07.2008 - 17:19 Written by [user id=27451] on 16.07.2008 at 13:55 Yeah, I hear you, well, black guy complaining about being arrested cause of his skin color would make some sense here since we are still like 98% white country, so people in generally are racists even most of them would never said that, there are two black dudes on my university and every time they pass through the campus you can hear all sort of jokes and similar things and 95% of those people who actually makes those jokes would never say for themselves they are racists lol my friend who is anti-fa or some crap like that once stopped his car when he saw a black girl on the street and said loudly viva la Africa, so, yeah, I would not be surprised some non-white to be arrested here cause he looks different, for example, gypsies are treated by old Gestapo system, always guilty until proven wrong lol But it sounds ridiculous that non-whites in countries with such a strong discrimination laws like England where or Germany where even a right hand salute is highly illegal complain about being arrested because of the skin color, that is bullshit, I know for a case where black guy killed his white girlfriend and when got arrested he accused police for being racialist HAHA crap.. Same with homosexuals and shit, they all want equality but they are not ready to enjoy such system. My US friend from Illinois, just spend 10 days at my place in Serbia said if you say to a black guy that he is black he can put you on court for racism and probably win that case, but if he tells you you are white you can also call a court case but will never ever win such case, that's bullshit. Also the laws where companies must employ some number of homosexuals or non-whites are crap, it is like, it does not matter who works better as long as it is "politically correct".. NWO crap. Although, this was a bit off topic
---- They say that we are gone but I can't let you down The heathen faith will rise again we won't fail now I know we cannot die forever is our time Give my people back to me free from Christianity!!!!
Loading...
|
Valentin B Iconoclast |
26.07.2008 - 19:46 Written by APOHAKC on 26.07.2008 at 17:19 lol i know it's offtopic but it's the same situation here. here's a typical romanian conversation about racism: interviewer: hello, are you a racist? romanian: no, of course not. i like blacks and jews. interviewer: but what about gypsies? romanian: KILL THEM ALL!!!!!
Loading...
|
Judas The Amputator |
30.07.2008 - 19:01 Written by Valentin B on 26.07.2008 at 19:46 Hahahahahahahahaha. I myself am someone 'of colour' (of light brown colour, in fact), and you might find it weird but it pisses me off the most when people use their 'difference' from the majority population as justification for why they're getting picked on. Oh, it can't be the fact that you stole someone's TV, no, the cops only want to get you because you look different. Reverse racism is so common these days, makes me sick. I mean, it does happen the other 'conventional' way as well, but I think it's bullshit when people say (and this happens a lot in Australia) that "immigrants are taking all our jobs", because most of the people saying this are uneducated douches themselves. Why whinge that people are taking your jobs when you've been on welfare even before the immigrants came? You never had a fuckin' job in the first place! A white Australian can sit on his/her ass and do nothing, but it's not OK for an immigrant to work here, apparently. In conclusion, idiots remain idiots regardless of their race.
---- "Once the game is over, the king and the pawn both go back into the same box."
Loading...
|
APOHAKC The Bard |
02.08.2008 - 18:05
lol Judas, I checked your pictures, you kinda look South American, anyway, it is funny that Australians compare about immigrations since all white people are immigrants on that Continent anyway, right? And beside, there are so many ways to characterize someone as white or non-white that it is rather confusing, from Nordicist theories to every immigrant is non-white no matter how he looks like, as Valentin said, Balkan countries are like that so I know such staff, we are all racists in generally even though 98% of people will never say that because ti is not much of their fault, that is something that is going on for centuries and people in generally are born with it, like, mothers will, and I am completely serious, tell you: if you see a gypsy in your class take care to seat as far as you can from him, or fathers will be like: you beat a gypsy, that's my boy, you can't even imagine what happened when some African loose his way somewhere around Balkan or Albanian in Serbia, although, not a fan of Albanians myself, it is mostly white society and still very sensitive on such things, even worst regarding religion, I don't wanna bore you how much shit I passed through cause of my ideologies.
---- They say that we are gone but I can't let you down The heathen faith will rise again we won't fail now I know we cannot die forever is our time Give my people back to me free from Christianity!!!!
Loading...
|
Ascendant187 |
19.12.2008 - 18:23 Written by APOHAKC on 02.08.2008 at 18:05 Some Australians are over the top with their anti-immigration approaches, true, but for the most part we're a very tolerant country. Perth and Sydney are highly multi-cultural capital cities. I think the main problem Australians have with immigrants are those who do it illegally (the boat people in particular). If people come here on their own accord, follow the correct procedures and all of that then I don't think there's a problem, at least not where I'm concerned. As for religion it's pretty much non-existent here. Every now and then the Christian/Catholic/etc churches harp on about something but no one ever really takes notice. It's mostly the Muslim communities that seem to either cause a stir or seem to be irate at something, which I personally don't always understand. Honestly, when I break it down I see the whole Muslim thing as Old Testament and Christanity being New Testament - it's all virtually the same, just a few changes here and there, and yet there's so many arguments over it.
Loading...
|
Italics Posts: 294 |
21.01.2009 - 18:12 Written by APOHAKC on 08.04.2008 at 15:49 This is a great post. This is all the signs of the times. In the last days, what is good will be considered evil, and what is evil will be considered good. The races, religions, and groups of people that bitch and moan the most about being discrimnated against, are usually the ones who do the most discriminating. Same with the way that most "open-minded, accepting" people are usually the first ones to throw a fit whenever somebody says something that goes against their personal beliefs. That's the problem with society nowadays... people can perceive the correct problems, they just blame the wrong sources for these problems.
---- But I Justify My Desire to No One
Loading...
|
Freezer |
21.01.2009 - 20:24
I suppose the fact is that a majority "bashing" a minority is an abuse of power (and I should say it is quite useless), while a minority fighting against a majority has different implications. That said, I oppose any kind of religion, not only Christianity.
---- We fly through this godless endeavor, we try to explain the black forever
Loading...
|
Ph0eNiX Fire from Above |
03.05.2009 - 05:37
When it comes to religionn itself , the organized kind is always abused. The places where they come from onthe other hand aren't. Religion has been twisted around for so much and for many agendas that it's not really much more than mind control with a twisted need to belong and a cheap way of putting it into a perspective that there's a way to a higher state of being following death. Awsome, but the problem is that people generally fall into the dogma more than the actual teachings directly. Religion is basically a presentation of dogma. In turn it's why they are failures ingeneral. Dogma in itself is a problem because it pretty much does not entail anything other than how to live down here with a preconditioned line of thought. The thought generally does not add up to the actual reality or the spiritual reality. SPirituality in itself works because it's more of a personal connection. That's what we are all supposed to be building for ourselves to grow as beings. Dogma just keeps you in one state, subserviant to the self. Then there's the heirarchical structure. None of which has anything to do with the basic structure we all should have which is humility. All religions teach humility as a basis of some kind. Meanwhile with those who have take on religion as their life, those who would be considered as "laypeople" generally automatically accept a subserviance. There is no different between a garbage man and a priest (no, it's not because they canbe portrayed as catering to trash) simply because it's the fact that the two beings are down here for the same thing. One path is no greater than the other path. It's all just a different way. Individuality supression is the main problem with most religions/the religious. Generally those who are locked into the whole deal with religion/dogma are unable to think past their reasonings. Their reasonings are normally preconditioned thoughts in regard to what they "learned as true"and not "what they have found to be true". All religions do have a deal to do with "right and wrong" which usually is referred to as universal truth. Cumulatively from all religons that can be summed up as follows: Don't kill it Don't rape it Don't use people Don't steal Personal physical gain is not the highest reward Help others Remember the self and progress the self Remember others and help them when you can If you look over religion and it's actual basises of teachings they differ dramatically. I'm not anti God or anti spiritworld iin any way becaused they didn't cause this reality to happen. People did.
----
Loading...
|
Angelic Storm Melodious |
29.10.2009 - 02:05
I think really it's because of the power that the christian faith and in particular, the catholic church has in the world. It's only really been since 9/11 that Islam has started coming in for harsh criticism. Judaism seems to have far less control over the world than christianity, meaning it's not picked on as much. I would agree however, that it's wrong that it's so hard to criticise Islam without being considered "racist". Islam certainly shouldn't be exempt from the criticism levelled at christianity. Centuries ago, it was christians killing people, and trying to convert people to the religion by violence, and intimidation. While this does not happen anymore, I think some countries do have trouble seperating church from state. Islam now, seems to be the way christianity was years ago, violently opposing anyone who isn't a member of the faith, and will use any means to try and get their views across. I think all religions, aside from those which have never condoned violence have the right to be condemned and criticised. As much as I hate christianity (or at least the organised religion aspects of it), I feel just the same way about Islam. Though I will stress, it's not so much the religion itself I have the problem with, more the fanatical views that some people of those religions hold.
Loading...
|
advent |
09.10.2010 - 02:51 Written by Angelic Storm on 29.10.2009 at 02:05 Agree with u to some extent , what happened in middle ages considering christian Europe is happening now in in Islamic countries in middle east , but it's not Islam or Christianity who killed, it's ignorance and poverty that fuel fanaticism in any country despite their religion , in the middle ages most Europe where like a 3rd world countries as much as most Islamic countries now , and it's easy then to fill people mind with hatred using their usual failure in achieving a proper life for themselves , most who participate in crusades against Islamic world where the poorest who think there a better life than they live if they just die for a " righteous cause" , exactly what's is happening now in Islamic world .There are many other reasons but no one of them has to do anything with religion , it's about human greed or ignorance or fanaticism .
Loading...
|
Zombie Thrash'tillDeath |
09.10.2010 - 03:11
One example of religious double standards are those fuckers from saudi arabia who prevent christians from entering certain cities and then they cry about when france bans the veil and when switzerland bans the mosque towers
---- None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free Johann Wolfgang van Goethe 1749-1832
Loading...
|
Angelic Storm Melodious |
09.10.2010 - 06:26 Written by Zombie on 09.10.2010 at 03:11 Now, I didnt know this, but yep, no Islamic country has the right to complain about the banning of veils etc.. if they have measures in place to suppress other religions. (and non-religious people) Im all for the banning of the veil. Its just a tool used to suppress women. Id hate to live in a country where I felt if I didnt wear it, I could be attacked for not doing so. @Advent: If you read my post, you'd have seen I said I have no problem with the faiths themselves, rather the members of faiths who are fanatics. This is why I oppose organised religion. Its all about control, and trying to restrict people's rights to free thinking on the matter.
Loading...
|
Zombie Thrash'tillDeath |
09.10.2010 - 07:21
That is only one of the things in Egypt christians aren't allowed to build churches or renovate the old ones unless they have a permission from the country's president himself !! lol ... and they're pissed coz in swizz they're not allowed to build towers, its not like they banned building mosques. now THOSE are hypocrites with double standards. lol
---- None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free Johann Wolfgang van Goethe 1749-1832
Loading...
|
ThisIsNotHere |
15.10.2010 - 22:44 Written by Zombie on 09.10.2010 at 07:21 Agreed. Make it consistent: ban building and renovating mosques in Switzerland. That way, Switzerland can protect its culture along with Egypt. Everyone wins.
---- I almost cried because I acted so insensitive
Loading...
|
Marcel Hubregtse Grumpy Old Fuck Elite |
17.10.2010 - 16:22
I disagrre with all that. Just because they don't allow it doesn't mean we should do the same. That is lowering ourselves to their standards. Not only that but also there is such a thing as freedom of religion in the constitution of western countries whereas there is no such thing in that of most muslim countries.
---- Member of the true crusade against European Flower Metal Yesterday is dead and gone, tomorrow is out of sight Dawn Crosby (r.i.p.) 05.04.1963 - 15.12.1996
Loading...
|
TOUGHEST MEMBER |
17.10.2010 - 19:29
Who got more money will be dominate in culture building, it is freedom and fair of individualism or to each institution themself for religion. @Some previous discussion: hell yeah, same here there are hypocritcal racists. Damn racists are everywhere, in each every race. So cute human race
Loading...
|
Valentin B Iconoclast |
17.10.2010 - 19:47 Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 17.10.2010 at 16:22 every time someone says a thing like the one you replied to, my reply is that it is exactly like saying "okay, so they are idiots, let's be idiots too!" so yeah, agreed the state religion used to be part of most countries' "culture", but anyone living in the 21st century with his/her body and mind must learn to grasp the concept of freedom of religion.
Loading...
|
Zombie Thrash'tillDeath |
18.10.2010 - 02:38
@ Valentin B: Actually i really admire Marcel's opinion, sure it doesnt work this way except in a utopian world that doesnt exist .. but still its the right thing to do, so until the definitions of 'right' and 'wrong' are reversed, i'm sticking to Marcel's opinion, let the west be the bigger one, and not stoop their level.
---- None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free Johann Wolfgang van Goethe 1749-1832
Loading...
|
Valentin B Iconoclast |
18.10.2010 - 16:36 Written by Zombie on 18.10.2010 at 02:38 that's exactly what i was saying too.. if someone is an idiot and tries to offend you in some way out of spite/religious zeal, you will be at the same level of stupidity if you try to apply that in reverse. for example if saudi arabia bans building christian churches, does sweden also have to ban mosques? or is sweden a secular country living in the 21st century when states should be free from the shackles of religious dogma and allow each and every other individual to choose his own faith?
Loading...
|
ThisIsNotHere |
18.10.2010 - 19:26
Back tracking a bit to the morality debate in the abortion thread, a vertical ranking scale applied to multiple cultures is inappropriate. Western values don't necessarily align with those of other countries. The problem Western Europe is facing is that they were too lenient on immigration, and some countries bent over backwards to cater to their new citizens. As a result, the conflict of values was aggravated and immigrants had less incentive to assimilate, giving the fewer and more outspoken radical Islamists a growing position of power. So what to do? Continuing to masochistically serve the Muslim immigrants creates a cultural erosion and conflict, but directly enacting a state religion betrays the Western concept of personal freedom and is too much of a jump from one end of the spectrum to another. Switzerland banning the minarets and France banning veils is a start. That in itself isn't enough. Banning construction of new Mosques could potentially help, but I say shut the problem off at the source: severely reduce (if not outright stop) immigration and promotion of multicultural ideas. Begin deporting problematic immigrants and ramp up border security. A constitution that allows for freedom of speech, religion, etc. is important for the West, but when others use it to their own advantage, it becomes threatened. If the bleeding hearts could see more than a few seconds ahead of themselves, maybe they'd quit crying "omg racist!!1!!1" and start working for an actual solution. And as far as I'm concerned, immigrants don't deserve the same level of power as native citizens. You're a guest in someone's country, play by their rules. Don't like it, don't move there. It's that simple.
---- I almost cried because I acted so insensitive
Loading...
|
Valentin B Iconoclast |
18.10.2010 - 23:53 Written by ThisIsNotHere on 18.10.2010 at 19:26 you make a valid point in the first sentences, i do agree countries are trying too hard to please tons of immigrants. but now what to do? throw them out? that would be against some of the fundamental points that the EU stands for(one of which is actually multiculturalism, and another one being, yeah you guessed it, freedom of religion). the problem here is for the people in charge to find a balance between preserving what is already there and trying to enrich it with immigrant culture, which like i said is one of the EU's goals. discriminately banning religious symbols or buildings is NOT the way to do it. you are basically limiting the freedom of a strict group of "evil ones", which is going to infuriate everyone from muslim radicals in golden palaces to atheists who understand the concept of freedom of religion and only please the radicals supporting the majority religion, which in turns pisses the muslim radicals more. in other words, it's like pouring gasoline on fire. what we need here is consistency in action instead of hypocrisy regarding religious freedom. if you ban the veil, you have to ban the star of david, the crucifix, the buddhist toga and everything else. if you ban a minaret, you have to ban a church bell tower. if you ban mosques, you have to ban churches, synagogues, buddhist temples, etc. either this OR you don't ban anything and you let the people build and wear whatever they want. i usually refrain from looking at things in black and white but in this case there is NO middle-path, it's either all or nothing, because it simply goes against some of the major points that the EU was actually created for.
Loading...
|
Zombie Thrash'tillDeath |
19.10.2010 - 03:54
Well, i think Education is the solution really, there has got to be religion-teaching in schools and not let the churches or the mosques do that or else we'll have cult-like ideas and incohesion of the community.. but, if religion is taught in schools, kids then would learn echothers religions and have respect for them and understand the differences and learn to accept them, and would most probably see the similarities and common ground in all religions.. and this -imo- would be a very effective way in eliminating extremist ideas that promotes the hate towards members of other religions based on misinformation about them. there has got to be more transparency about the religion issue, and it shouldnt be a secret kept in the church or mosque.
---- None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free Johann Wolfgang van Goethe 1749-1832
Loading...
|
Valentin B Iconoclast |
19.10.2010 - 11:34 Written by Zombie on 19.10.2010 at 03:54 i think education is always the problem when dealing with religious/political extremists sadly. with religious education classes you may never know if the teacher is using it to further his/her views and simply hammer them into the students' unwilling skulls, which is a very dangerous thing to do. we had religious education classes and they ONLY focused on how good Christ was, how awesome the Gospels are etc. never saying a word about judaism or islamism. i think that needs to change. in an ideal world i guess it would be best to have some kind of unified religious education commitee of teachers who are by some means totally objective on the subject. it's pretty tricky but if the EU somehow manages to do that, i think we will have advanced a couple of steps in the direction of freedom of religion and encouraging moderacy and dialogue between the different faiths. of course though, there is always the issue of HOME education, something which the state simply cannot regulate. we all know no-one is born a bigot, but you are MADE so by your parents mostly.
Loading...
|
Zombie Thrash'tillDeath |
19.10.2010 - 13:51
No, you got me all wrong.. i didnt mean tht they should teach religion seperately at schools according to each group.. (ie christians learn christianity, muslims learn islam, jews learn judaism...) i meant that an unbiased curricilum should be put nd reviewd by the ministry of education that teaches ALL religions, each in chapter or something.. so, muslims learn about their own religion and about others.. same with christians..etc.
---- None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free Johann Wolfgang van Goethe 1749-1832
Loading...
|
Valentin B Iconoclast |
19.10.2010 - 14:25 Written by Zombie on 19.10.2010 at 13:51 again, that's exactly what i was saying too.. i think you need new glasses
Loading...
|
Marcel Hubregtse Grumpy Old Fuck Elite |
19.10.2010 - 14:43
What Zombie and you are suggesting are the type of religious classes we get in secular schools in The Netherlands.
---- Member of the true crusade against European Flower Metal Yesterday is dead and gone, tomorrow is out of sight Dawn Crosby (r.i.p.) 05.04.1963 - 15.12.1996
Loading...
|