I understand corrupt. India is swayed with UPI(Unified Payments Interface) integrated on payment apps like Google Pay. Even if you buy a stuff for 10 bucks, you make digital payment.
Apple and Google Pay work without needing a connection, fortunately. What happens here quite often is that payment terminals fail so sometimes you're in a restaurant or bar and cannot pay your bill.
Disc I 01. Tempore Nihil Sanat (Prelude In F Minor) 02. Never Forgive, Never Forget 03. War Eternal 04. As The Pages Burn 05. No More Regrets 06. You Will Know My Name 07. Graveyard Of Dreams 08. Stolen Life 09. Time Is Black 10. On And On 11. Avalanche 12. Down To Nothing 13. Not Long For This World 14. Shadow On The Wall [Mike Oldfield cover][bonus] 15. Breaking The Law [Judas Priest cover][Japanese bonus]
Disc II[Seeds Of War - The Demos] 01. Never Forgive, Never Forget [demo] 02. No More Regrets [demo] 03. You Will Know My Name [demo] 04. On And On [demo] 05. As The Pages Turn [demo]
Disc III[Instrumental] 01. Never Forgive, Never Forget [instrumental version] 02. War Eternal [instrumental version] 03. As The Pages Burn [instrumental version] 04. No More Regrets [instrumental version] 05. You Will Know My Name [instrumental version] 06. Stolen Life [instrumental version] 07. Time Is Black [instrumental version] 08. On And On [instrumental version] 09. Avalanche [instrumental version] 10. Down To Nothing [instrumental version]
Ah? Arch Enemy - the love-it or hate-it band since having a female vocalist who growls. Regardless, most casual listeners of the band would agree that Khaos Legions was one of those forgettable releases that they won't mind putting behind.
Now that Angela Gossow has retreated to the side lines, the band has a chance to start afresh with Alissa White-Gluz. Personally, I usually had no problem with the vocals of Angela, and Alissa sounds like the perfect replacement. Instead, what matters is that the overall aggression and energy is back, so either the band has listened to its critics or Alissa has reinvigorated the sound of the band. The melodies and riffs sound less stale, the cascading solos are quite impressive and the music in general is definitely more head-bangable.
Here's the problem though. Khaos Legions was such a low point for the band that it's not hard to top it, so it's only natural for War Eternal to be relatively superior in almost every category. Furthermore, one should take into account that expectations had been lowered so much, so meeting or even exceeding them is not such a difficult task. Despite the album on the whole is inoffensive and even pretty good at some points, it's not something I would recommend to those who want to get into Arch Enemy, or just those wanting some great Gothenburg / melodic death / extreme power metal.
The light at the end of the tunnel is that it really does seem that the band has gotten out of that tunnel that they've dug themselves into, and it's nice to see them foray into some previously unexplored territory with some symphonic sprinkles here and there. Is it time for Arch Enemy to change their sound? I'd imagine the fan-base would be rather divided if the band continues to expand into that direction. Ultimately, I'm fine with either option, and it's just a matter of how well they are executed that matters. In the case of War Eternal, the song-writing still leaves the listener wanting more, specifically in terms of being memorable. As mentioned earlier, the band feels energised again, but in most cases, raw energy and conviction is not enough. While one can compose brutal songs and come up with the most blistering riffs, the defining factor here is not being able to be vicious with a lasting impression.
Michael Amott needs to be in side projects of different genres of metal. His writing has been really dull, repetative and boring as hell. It sucks cus' he's a great guitarist.
I agree with most of the review but I'd still rate it higher. The more I listen to the album, the more I like it, I only find 3 songs without any memorable part, easily forgotten among the rest.
People are always talking about the lack of originality, but what's wrong with repeating the formula if it works? I mean, I sure prefer original albums, but a classic sound from time to time doesn't hurt, and Arch Enemy executed it very well here.
(P.S. - I don't get it, two people commenting exactly the same in the review and the album post by slightly different words, saying they don't like the album - why bother so much to say the same thing twice if you don't like it anyway?)
----
Taste the DARK...
... and you'll live FOREVER!
Where are all the Arch Enemy fans trying to steer this back on topic? The fact that we're all talking about pop bands from the '90s instead of this album goes to show how excited we all are about its release I guess...
----
"Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something."
Not a bad album, but I'd personally give it a 0 in originality. I've heard this a thousand times before. Got bored after first listen.
Well i think they noticed the crap Khaos Legions was, forgot it, and made this a Gossow lite album just with Alissa on vocals
Not surprising since i think Wages of Sin was basically a Liiva era album just with Angela on vocals, in clear contrast to the sound of the following albums
Written by Warman on 07.11.2007 at 22:39 Haha, that's like saying "compose your own Metal album and upload it here, instead of writing a review of an album". :lol:
Not surprising since i think Wages of Sin was basically a Liiva era album just with Angela on vocals, in clear contrast to the sound of the following albums
Didn't sound like that to me. Wages of Sin sounded more like Anthems than it did Burning Bridges. Burning Bridges had that dirty, chugging sound with lots of groove and heavier sounding guitars, whereas Wages was tighter, thrashier and had a darker tone about it, and very different sounding guitars, most of which were carried over to Anthems.
I'm a big Arch Enemy fan, and I'd only give this between 7.2 and 7.5. It is decent, and the more I listen to it the more I like it, but it's nowhere near as good as Wages of Sin or Doomsday Machine. Alissa is ok, but I think Angela was 10x better, and I miss her. The band is capable of so much more than this.
Michael Amott needs to be in side projects of different genres of metal. His writing has been really dull, repetative and boring as hell. It sucks cus' he's a great guitarist.
He's been in Spiritual Beggars for the past 20 years.
This is a mostly average album, with vocals even worse than Angela's deteriorating performance on later AE albums. They're thin, weak, and flat, with no venom whatsoever. Musically, a small amount of the album is good, but the same could be said about "Khaos Legions", which was another mostly poor album. The best songs on KL are better than most of the songs on here, and again, this album is a fair way off from their best works quality wise.
And I agree with Troy. Alissa's posing in that video is embarrassing!
I tried to get into Arch Enemy a couple of times but really, I cannot get into femal growls The title track doesn't sound so bad but the voice doesn't help support the music imho.
Looks like I disagree with just about every post above me Yes it's in the same AE formula and has its generic moments but you could say that about most of their discography. They went for the 'same formula' route, I think someone above said this already but sometimes that works better than a band trying to completely reshape their sound. This album does venture into new territory anyway, especially through the use of symphonic elements, though not in a massive manner :- something I always loved about AE is Ammott's guitar solos when they are more prominent in songs, they definitely worked on this more in War Eternal. There is a sense of nostalgia from this album; hell, some parts of the album remind me of the songs they did in the Liiva Era.
I don't mind Alissa's vocals and I thought it was more innovative than Khaos Legions and musically it's probably their best material since Doomsday Machine.
I think that most of these old melodic death metal bands like In Flames, Dark Tranquillity, Amon Amarth, Arch Enemy, and etc have long burned out their creativity and are only living off their big name and former glory. It's time to move on and give praise to new bands that bring something fresh to the genre. As the saying goes: you can't teach an old dog new tricks.
Pretty much. Only problem with new bands is that new Melodic DM bands don't bring anything fresh to the genre.
Right now Melodic DM seems completely stuck in a rutt.
well there is Allegaeon, but they are rather melodic "death"
then there also was Infernal Poetry that after a quite conventional start on their last 2 albums could be described as kind of melodic death without sounding like any melodic death band
they unfortunately split up though
Written by Warman on 07.11.2007 at 22:39 Haha, that's like saying "compose your own Metal album and upload it here, instead of writing a review of an album". :lol:
Thoroughly enjoyed this album, although I have listened to it as an extreme power metal album rather than death metal. Its not particularly heavy or aggressive and benefits from this melodically. Being a power metal fan that is what I enjoy.
I have never been a fan of harsh vocals, but these fit well, better than Angela in this newer more melodic sound. It has rekindled my interest in the band and has been on repeat in my car for a week. If the follow up continues in this vein I will be happy. Solos were spot on and the introduction of symphonic elements were an unexpected and welcome addition.
It depends on what you want from an album I suppose. If you want aggressive vocals, little melody and maintaining the same law of diminishing returns then fine. If you want a fresher sound, reinvigorated vocals, great solos, a melodic edge and venturing in to symphonic elements, I would recommend this.
I'm neutral about the vocals (so I am not wow-ed by it, nor am I put off by it), thought the solos were good, but the melodic edge was too sugary. While the sound is indeed fresher, the last album was so... mouldy that most things sound fresher lol. My main gripe is that whether it's the aggressive parts or the melodic parts, they should be written in a more memorable way, which isn't the case in here to my ears.
I think that most of these old melodic death metal bands like In Flames, Dark Tranquillity, Amon Amarth, Arch Enemy, and etc have long burned out their creativity and are only living off their big name and former glory. It's time to move on and give praise to new bands that bring something fresh to the genre. As the saying goes: you can't teach an old dog new tricks.
I think that most of these old melodic death metal bands like In Flames, Dark Tranquillity, Amon Amarth, Arch Enemy, and etc have long burned out their creativity and are only living off their big name and former glory. It's time to move on and give praise to new bands that bring something fresh to the genre. As the saying goes: you can't teach an old dog new tricks.
Such as...?
Be'lakor, Insomnium, Omnium Gatherum, and Allegaeon come to mind easily. Amorphis is also still putting out good material. There's also bands like Witherscape that may not be exactly melodic death metal, but will appeal to much of the same crowd.
Written by Valankir on 22.06.2014 at 19:55 Be'lakor, Insomnium, Omnium Gatherum
You're calling these bands fresh? They're all about as stagnant as Arch Enemy - they just happen to be more atmospheric and less thrash-influenced.
Fair enough - I shouldn't say these are bands are bringing anything brand new to the genre, particularly Insomnium and Omnium Gatherum. I'm interested to see where Be'lakor goes when they put out another album. The last two CD's were very good, but very similar - almost felt like part1 and part 2.
What I was aiming at was that the bands execute very well and have yet to disappoint me like the original big names. Overall I think some of the issue is that this is a mature genre that shares a lot of overlap with several other genre's so some of the 'growth' is likely attributed to progressive, technical, atmoshpheric etc depending on how picky people get with genre tagging.
I'm enjoying this album. I like my underground and groundbreaking metal just as much as anyone, but every now and then I want to sprawl out on the couch in my boxers and stained undershirt, and ingest some Easy Cheese with crackers. I like some generic, quick payoff metal and I'm not ashamed.