MadTinus
Posts: 13
|
14.09.2007 - 00:49Rating: 5
Load and Reload worse than St. Anger, wow that's just stunning...
The crappiest song on (Re)Load is still lightyears better than St. Anger i.m.V.H.o.
Loading...
|
Powerslave16 Account deleted |
Powerslave16 Account deleted
I fine example of what I mean...it will always be unfairly considered their worst. I have yet to sit and listen to Reload once all the way through, I start vomiting 5 songs into it.;D
Loading...
|
MadTinus
Posts: 13
|
14.09.2007 - 20:14Rating: 5
Well, then just skip straight to "Where The Wild Things Are" or "Fixxxer", absolutely monumental songs. Seriously, do yourself a favour.
Loading...
|
Powerslave16 Account deleted |
Powerslave16 Account deleted
I have. I have listened to Reload many times. I admit WTWTA and Fixxer are 2 of the better songs, but they aren't great songs. They have moments of awesomeness but sometimes lag (like most of the St. Anger album). The think that separates St. Anger with Reload is that St. Anger has a lot of good/not great tracks and 4 great tracks. Reload has about 3 good/not great tracks, 1 good track, and the rest just plain sucks.
Loading...
|
meanmrme Account deleted |
meanmrme Account deleted
St. Anger was complete fucking 15 y/o pimply faced just learning how to play garbage.
Loading...
|
Powerslave16 Account deleted |
Powerslave16 Account deleted
Well then, if I was a pimply faced 15 year old kid playing this stuff then thats fine. I love the riffs.
Loading...
|
Syk myspace/bonerama
Posts: 1504 |
15.09.2007 - 20:45Rating: 4
Sykmyspace/boneramaPosts: 1504
Wow, another review for this thing. Good job, it's nice to hear someone not bashing every last particle of Anger down to the ground, though I would have made more of a mention on the unnecessary length/repetition of the songs - however that has nearly always been a problem for Met, it seems much worse here considering the extent of repetition and the quality of what's repeated.
Now is it time someone did a proper review of Justice?
Loading...
|
W-Lash Metal Master
Posts: 2531 |
Sorry dude, but you should get a warning or something like that for such good vote for obviously bad album.
Loading...
|
oncewasnot_duna Account deleted |
oncewasnot_duna Account deleted
I kind of didn't see the point for this review . . . But, hey; everything on there is kinda' true.
Shit, I just can't stand Sr. Anger in general. It's hard to listen to something like Ride the Lightning, and then think of something such as St. Anger.
Loading...
|
Powerslave16 Account deleted |
Powerslave16 Account deleted
Written by W-Lash on 20.09.2007 at 23:21
Sorry dude, but you should get a warning or something like that for such good vote for obviously bad album.
I think 7.2 shouldn't really be called "such a good vote". That is barely passing in my mind. Besides, I think a good review for a bad album is better than a bad review for a good album. Have you seen the ...And Justice review on here?
Loading...
|
W-Lash Metal Master
Posts: 2531 |
Written by [user id=23719] on 21.09.2007 at 06:20
Written by W-Lash on 20.09.2007 at 23:21
Sorry dude, but you should get a warning or something like that for such good vote for obviously bad album.
I think 7.2 shouldn't really be called "such a good vote". That is barely passing in my mind. Besides, I think a good review for a bad album is better than a bad review for a good album. Have you seen the ...And Justice review on here?
Not really...And what's with that?
Loading...
|
Marcel Hubregtse Grumpy Old Fuck ElitePosts: 40071 |
Written by [user id=23719] on 21.09.2007 at 06:20
Written by W-Lash on 20.09.2007 at 23:21
Sorry dude, but you should get a warning or something like that for such good vote for obviously bad album.
I think 7.2 shouldn't really be called "such a good vote". That is barely passing in my mind. Besides, I think a good review for a bad album is better than a bad review for a good album. Have you seen the ...And Justice review on here?
Since when is 7.2 hardly a pass? 7.2 = 72% which means it is a tad about average.
----
Member of the true crusade against European Flower Metal
Yesterday is dead and gone, tomorrow is out of sight
Dawn Crosby (r.i.p.)
05.04.1963 - 15.12.1996
Loading...
|
Powerslave16 Account deleted |
Powerslave16 Account deleted
Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 21.09.2007 at 19:00
Written by [user id=23719] on 21.09.2007 at 06:20
Written by W-Lash on 20.09.2007 at 23:21
Sorry dude, but you should get a warning or something like that for such good vote for obviously bad album.
I think 7.2 shouldn't really be called "such a good vote". That is barely passing in my mind. Besides, I think a good review for a bad album is better than a bad review for a good album. Have you seen the ...And Justice review on here?
Since when is 7.2 hardly a pass? 7.2 = 72% which means it is a tad about average.
Fine then. What do you consider a "failing" score? 6.9 is where the suck begins to get poured on for me. Thats just me I guess, but I think this album deserves a 7.2. 96% of Metallica fans/haters will disagree, but I don't care. It is a decent album that doesn't deserve the banner of "Worst Metallica Album". Thats just my opinion, of course, but I stand by it.
Loading...
|
Marcel Hubregtse Grumpy Old Fuck ElitePosts: 40071 |
Written by [user id=23719] on 21.09.2007 at 23:04
Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 21.09.2007 at 19:00
Written by [user id=23719] on 21.09.2007 at 06:20
Written by W-Lash on 20.09.2007 at 23:21
Sorry dude, but you should get a warning or something like that for such good vote for obviously bad album.
I think 7.2 shouldn't really be called "such a good vote". That is barely passing in my mind. Besides, I think a good review for a bad album is better than a bad review for a good album. Have you seen the ...And Justice review on here?
Since when is 7.2 hardly a pass? 7.2 = 72% which means it is a tad about average.
Fine then. What do you consider a "failing" score? 6.9 is where the suck begins to get poured on for me. Thats just me I guess, but I think this album deserves a 7.2. 96% of Metallica fans/haters will disagree, but I don't care. It is a decent album that doesn't deserve the banner of "Worst Metallica Album". Thats just my opinion, of course, but I stand by it.
A fail score is anything UNDER 5.5 in my books. Just like it is in schools.
----
Member of the true crusade against European Flower Metal
Yesterday is dead and gone, tomorrow is out of sight
Dawn Crosby (r.i.p.)
05.04.1963 - 15.12.1996
Loading...
|
Powerslave16 Account deleted |
Powerslave16 Account deleted
Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 21.09.2007 at 23:08
Written by [user id=23719] on 21.09.2007 at 23:04
Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 21.09.2007 at 19:00
Written by [user id=23719] on 21.09.2007 at 06:20
Written by W-Lash on 20.09.2007 at 23:21
Sorry dude, but you should get a warning or something like that for such good vote for obviously bad album.
I think 7.2 shouldn't really be called "such a good vote". That is barely passing in my mind. Besides, I think a good review for a bad album is better than a bad review for a good album. Have you seen the ...And Justice review on here?
Since when is 7.2 hardly a pass? 7.2 = 72% which means it is a tad about average.
Fine then. What do you consider a "failing" score? 6.9 is where the suck begins to get poured on for me. Thats just me I guess, but I think this album deserves a 7.2. 96% of Metallica fans/haters will disagree, but I don't care. It is a decent album that doesn't deserve the banner of "Worst Metallica Album". Thats just my opinion, of course, but I stand by it.
A fail score is anything UNDER 5.5 in my books. Just like it is in schools.
...you fail after 5.5's? I am from the States, and we fail a class if our end average is 69.4. Anything under a 70 is failing. I guess its about where you come from, I have never thought about grading systems for different countries...how strange...
Loading...
|
Syk myspace/bonerama
Posts: 1504 |
22.09.2007 - 08:50Rating: 4
Sykmyspace/boneramaPosts: 1504
That is a good point. Very funny if you consider that my automotive class would fail any test less than 100% You can't really argue how your personality divides passing and failing numbers, it's just the same as varying musical tastes. Myself, I give Anger a 5 and consider it acceptable - just barely. Worst Metallica album indeed IMO (so far...) but definitely not worst music album ever.
Loading...
|
Hembrom Diabolic Priest
Posts: 1388 |
Solid Stupid Review
Loading...
|
+{Jonas}+ I R Serious Cat
Posts: 4955 |
20.10.2007 - 03:28Rating: 8
I partially agree with this review. I really think St. Anger was more like a turnpoint to something else and better. I cant' wait for the next year's release.
----
"Nobody wants to be the weird kid, you just end up being the weird kid. You don't know how you ended up getting there" - Rob Zombie
http://jonas-bs.deviantart.com My dA, mainly photography, go check it out!
Loading...
|
Nixx Account deleted |
Nixx Account deleted
If people think St.Anger is the worst music album ever, they should pull their heads out of their asses and listen to more music.
And I find it funny how "extreme Metallica fans" claim to enjoy Load and Reload more, when St.Anger is 10 times more "extreme".
Loading...
|
Insineratehymn Account deleted |
Insineratehymn Account deleted
Written by Hembrom on 24.09.2007 at 15:40
Solid Stupid Review
I agree. It contains a high score for such an atrocious album.
Loading...
|
Stalker Lone wanderer
Posts: 2705 |
06.12.2007 - 21:34Rating: 1
I dont know really, Ive heard max 3 songs from this album, and it is 3 songs too much. I will never manage to understand why the hell do they needed this , but.... I wouldnt score it more than 5, no way... And becaue it is by an acomplished band, it deserves no more than 2......
----
Loading...
|
Syk myspace/bonerama
Posts: 1504 |
08.12.2007 - 06:37Rating: 4
Sykmyspace/boneramaPosts: 1504
Written by Stalker on 06.12.2007 at 21:34 And becaue it is by an acomplished band, it deserves no more than 2...
How do you figure that? Are new[ish] bands incapable of creating "pure shit"? (For the record my opinion has changed from 5 to 4)
Loading...
|
Dane Train Beers & Kilts ElitePosts: 8902 |
My problem with St. Anger was not that it was a Nu-Metal album. It was that it was a bad Nu-Metal album. Nothing on it was really interesting, or original. It is not even that it wasn't Thrash Metal, because Load is my favorite Metallica album.
----
(space for rent)
Loading...
|
Stalker Lone wanderer
Posts: 2705 |
08.12.2007 - 14:23Rating: 1
Written by Syk on 08.12.2007 at 06:37
Written by Stalker on 06.12.2007 at 21:34 And becaue it is by an acomplished band, it deserves no more than 2...
How do you figure that? Are new[ish] bands incapable of creating "pure shit"? (For the record my opinion has changed from 5 to 4)
I dont really understand what are you saying, sorry... but, of course, 'new(ish) bands do produce "pure shit", many of them, that wasnt my point, the point was something different - if you look at what this band is (was) capable of, (just look at the Ride The Lightning for instance), and that look at their last album, isnt that waste of time, talent, and all??? I hope you understood me, kinda....
----
Loading...
|
Syk myspace/bonerama
Posts: 1504 |
08.12.2007 - 14:33Rating: 4
Sykmyspace/boneramaPosts: 1504
Written by Stalker on 08.12.2007 at 14:23 if you look at what this band is (was) capable of, (just look at the Ride The Lightning for instance)
Exactly, it's not the same band, it's 20 years and two bassists later. It just seemed a bad sentence where you said "wouldnt score it more than 5 ... And becaue it is by an acomplished band, it deserves no more than 2" like a double standard where one should not exist
Loading...
|
Stalker Lone wanderer
Posts: 2705 |
08.12.2007 - 14:42Rating: 1
Written by Syk on 08.12.2007 at 14:33
Written by Stalker on 08.12.2007 at 14:23 if you look at what this band is (was) capable of, (just look at the Ride The Lightning for instance)
Exactly, it's not the same band, it's 20 years and two bassists later. It just seemed a bad sentence where you said "wouldnt score it more than 5 ... And becaue it is by an acomplished band, it deserves no more than 2" like a double standard where one should not exist
Yeah youre right, but its like, you see many such (young) untalented bands pop up every day, and when they make something like this, naturally, you wouldnt be disapointed, I mean, who gives a fuck, but when a band that used to be SOMETHING some years ago, makes something like this....
----
Loading...
|
RhysTerk
Posts: 161
|
19.02.2008 - 22:42Rating: 8
I think it's a good review and a good rate.
I mean, what's actually the bad thing about songs like St. Anger, Frantic, Purify and Some kind of monster?
Loading...
|
SlaytallicA Lycanthropy
Posts: 1261 |
02.03.2008 - 21:12Rating: 3
7,2? That's way high,I gave it a 5... Although this album is better then the load ones...
----
One Pound Of Flesh, No More No Less, No Cartilage, No Bones, But Only Flesh...
Loading...
|
Damnated Churchburner
Posts: 4943 |
lol the worst review i saw on MS. you don't actually say anything, you just talk gibberish.
i guess you wrote this review so you could give it a higher score. lame.
----
Blessed is he that murders Christ in himself and in his fellow men.
Written by TheBigRossowski on 10.02.2009 at 16:01
if my wife and I can't conceive, I want a medical shipment of your sperm so our baby will be just like you.
Loading...
|
Valentin B Iconoclast
Posts: 10094 |
an atrocious album imo, but everyone is entitled to their opinion.
Loading...
|