RavenLord
Posts: 651 |
The fact that the band joke about 'There are guitar solos this time!' and 'We remembered to tune Lars' snare drums!' in interviews speaks volumes about how shit even they think the album is. When the people who write the album think it's a bad joke, you know it can never rise above complete and utter mediocrity. Hell, if St. Anger was mediocre, it'd be halfway enjoyable!
Loading...
|
Arian Totalis The Philosopher
Posts: 3351 |
Written by RavenLord on 12.06.2007 at 13:08
When the people who write the album think it's a bad joke, you know it can never rise above complete and utter mediocrity. Hell, if St. Anger was mediocre, it'd be halfway enjoyable!
Well said my friend, well said.
----
"For the Coward there is no Life
For the hero there is No Death"
-Kakita Toshimoko
"The Philosopher, you know so much about nothing at all." _Chuck Schuldiner.
Loading...
|
Warman Erotic Stains
Posts: 7695 |
20.06.2007 - 15:32Rating: 9
WarmanErotic StainsPosts: 7695
Well I consider this to be a good album, and I also love the singles. So now everybody will quote me and say WTF... let me then explain:
I was 13 years old when this album came. I didn't even own an album, I listened to some downloaded Iron Maiden and Metallica (Enter Sandman, Sad but True)... and that's like it! I considered Enter Sandman to be one of the heaviest songs ever. Then St. Anger turned up on MTV, and it was even heavier. As a 13-year old with a Metal taste that hadn't developed a bit, I couldn't resist St. Anger. I've grown up with St. Anger as a Metalhead. And for that it will always have my respect!
----
Loading...
|
Insineratehymn Account deleted |
Insineratehymn Account deleted
Written by Warman on 20.06.2007 at 15:32
Well I consider this to be a good album, and I also love the singles. So now everybody will quote me and say WTF... let me then explain:
I was 13 years old when this album came. I didn't even own an album, I listened to some downloaded Iron Maiden and Metallica (Enter Sandman, Sad but True)... and that's like it! I thought! I considered Enter Sandman to be one of the heaviest songs ever. Then St. Anger turned up on MTV, and it was even heavier. As a 13-year old with a Metal taste that hadn't developed a bit, I couldn't resist St. Anger. I've grown up with St. Anger as a Metalhead. And for that it will always have my respect!
If you think that "St. Crapfest Anger" is the heaviest stuff you've ever heard, then you've clearly never heard the work from any death metal, black metal, or grindcore band. However, I respect that. Within a few years, you will come to hate "St. Anger" just like the majority of metalheads here.
Loading...
|
Warman Erotic Stains
Posts: 7695 |
21.06.2007 - 14:47Rating: 9
WarmanErotic StainsPosts: 7695
Written by [user id=5630] on 20.06.2007 at 22:46
Written by Warman on 20.06.2007 at 15:32
Well I consider this to be a good album, and I also love the singles. So now everybody will quote me and say WTF... let me then explain:
I was 13 years old when this album came. I didn't even own an album, I listened to some downloaded Iron Maiden and Metallica (Enter Sandman, Sad but True)... and that's like it! I thought! I considered Enter Sandman to be one of the heaviest songs ever. Then St. Anger turned up on MTV, and it was even heavier. As a 13-year old with a Metal taste that hadn't developed a bit, I couldn't resist St. Anger. I've grown up with St. Anger as a Metalhead. And for that it will always have my respect!
If you think that "St. Crapfest Anger" is the heaviest stuff you've ever heard, then you've clearly never heard the work from any death metal, black metal, or grindcore band. However, I respect that. Within a few years, you will come to hate "St. Anger" just like the majority of metalheads here.
Huh? Yeah, I love bands such as Emperor, Morbid Angel, Mayhem, Death, Burzum, Dimmu Borgir, Celtic Frost, Satyricon, Immortal etc. and of course I think St. Anger is the heaviest I've ever heard!!! C'mon, please... read what I wrote. I was 13 (4 years ago) years old and hadn't heard that much Metal, and I thought BACK THEN that it was the heaviest stuff ever...
----
Loading...
|
Insineratehymn Account deleted |
Insineratehymn Account deleted
Written by Warman on 21.06.2007 at 14:47
Written by [user id=5630] on 20.06.2007 at 22:46
Written by Warman on 20.06.2007 at 15:32
Well I consider this to be a good album, and I also love the singles. So now everybody will quote me and say WTF... let me then explain:
I was 13 years old when this album came. I didn't even own an album, I listened to some downloaded Iron Maiden and Metallica (Enter Sandman, Sad but True)... and that's like it! I thought! I considered Enter Sandman to be one of the heaviest songs ever. Then St. Anger turned up on MTV, and it was even heavier. As a 13-year old with a Metal taste that hadn't developed a bit, I couldn't resist St. Anger. I've grown up with St. Anger as a Metalhead. And for that it will always have my respect!
If you think that "St. Crapfest Anger" is the heaviest stuff you've ever heard, then you've clearly never heard the work from any death metal, black metal, or grindcore band. However, I respect that. Within a few years, you will come to hate "St. Anger" just like the majority of metalheads here.
Huh? Yeah, I love bands such as Emperor, Morbid Angel, Mayhem, Death, Burzum, Dimmu Borgir, Celtic Frost, Satyricon, Immortal etc. and of course I think St. Anger is the heaviest I've ever heard!!! C'mon, please... read what I wrote. I was 13 (4 years ago) years old and hadn't heard that much Metal, and I thought BACK THEN that it was the heaviest stuff ever...
I know. But after a few years of listening to metal you will soon come to hate "St. Anger" just like everyone else.
Loading...
|
Warman Erotic Stains
Posts: 7695 |
21.06.2007 - 23:20Rating: 9
WarmanErotic StainsPosts: 7695
Written by [user id=5630] on 21.06.2007 at 23:15
Written by Warman on 21.06.2007 at 14:47
Written by [user id=5630] on 20.06.2007 at 22:46
Written by Warman on 20.06.2007 at 15:32
Well I consider this to be a good album, and I also love the singles. So now everybody will quote me and say WTF... let me then explain:
I was 13 years old when this album came. I didn't even own an album, I listened to some downloaded Iron Maiden and Metallica (Enter Sandman, Sad but True)... and that's like it! I thought! I considered Enter Sandman to be one of the heaviest songs ever. Then St. Anger turned up on MTV, and it was even heavier. As a 13-year old with a Metal taste that hadn't developed a bit, I couldn't resist St. Anger. I've grown up with St. Anger as a Metalhead. And for that it will always have my respect!
If you think that "St. Crapfest Anger" is the heaviest stuff you've ever heard, then you've clearly never heard the work from any death metal, black metal, or grindcore band. However, I respect that. Within a few years, you will come to hate "St. Anger" just like the majority of metalheads here.
Huh? Yeah, I love bands such as Emperor, Morbid Angel, Mayhem, Death, Burzum, Dimmu Borgir, Celtic Frost, Satyricon, Immortal etc. and of course I think St. Anger is the heaviest I've ever heard!!! C'mon, please... read what I wrote. I was 13 (4 years ago) years old and hadn't heard that much Metal, and I thought BACK THEN that it was the heaviest stuff ever...
I know. But after a few years of listening to metal you will soon come to hate "St. Anger" just like everyone else.
No, I'm pretty sure I will not. Metallica is the most important band for me... and I LOVE many songs on the album. I know that I'll never hate it.
And BTW, you think it has to do with age or something? "After a few years of listening..."? You're younger than me, I don't know how long you've listened to Metal but I've listened since I was 11 and before that I listened to Rock my whole life.
----
Loading...
|
Insineratehymn Account deleted |
Insineratehymn Account deleted
Written by Warman on 21.06.2007 at 23:20
Written by [user id=5630] on 21.06.2007 at 23:15
Written by Warman on 21.06.2007 at 14:47
Written by [user id=5630] on 20.06.2007 at 22:46
Written by Warman on 20.06.2007 at 15:32
Well I consider this to be a good album, and I also love the singles. So now everybody will quote me and say WTF... let me then explain:
I was 13 years old when this album came. I didn't even own an album, I listened to some downloaded Iron Maiden and Metallica (Enter Sandman, Sad but True)... and that's like it! I thought! I considered Enter Sandman to be one of the heaviest songs ever. Then St. Anger turned up on MTV, and it was even heavier. As a 13-year old with a Metal taste that hadn't developed a bit, I couldn't resist St. Anger. I've grown up with St. Anger as a Metalhead. And for that it will always have my respect!
If you think that "St. Crapfest Anger" is the heaviest stuff you've ever heard, then you've clearly never heard the work from any death metal, black metal, or grindcore band. However, I respect that. Within a few years, you will come to hate "St. Anger" just like the majority of metalheads here.
Huh? Yeah, I love bands such as Emperor, Morbid Angel, Mayhem, Death, Burzum, Dimmu Borgir, Celtic Frost, Satyricon, Immortal etc. and of course I think St. Anger is the heaviest I've ever heard!!! C'mon, please... read what I wrote. I was 13 (4 years ago) years old and hadn't heard that much Metal, and I thought BACK THEN that it was the heaviest stuff ever...
I know. But after a few years of listening to metal you will soon come to hate "St. Anger" just like everyone else.
No, I'm pretty sure I will not. Metallica is the most important band for me... and I LOVE many songs on the album. I know that I'll never hate it.
And BTW, you think it has to do with age or something? "After a few years of listening..."? You're younger than me, I don't know how long you've listened to Metal but I've listened since I was 11 and before that I listened to Rock my whole life.
I used to think like you. I used to think that "St. Anger" was the heaviest album ever, but after just one month of listening to it, I finally came to the conclusion "Wow! This is the worst album in existence!" It may not come today, it may not come tomorrow, but someday you will realize that "St. Anger" is the most piss poor album in metal history just like everyone else.
Loading...
|
Warman Erotic Stains
Posts: 7695 |
23.06.2007 - 18:28Rating: 9
WarmanErotic StainsPosts: 7695
Written by [user id=5630] on 22.06.2007 at 00:16
Written by Warman on 21.06.2007 at 23:20
Written by [user id=5630] on 21.06.2007 at 23:15
Written by Warman on 21.06.2007 at 14:47
Written by [user id=5630] on 20.06.2007 at 22:46
Written by Warman on 20.06.2007 at 15:32
Well I consider this to be a good album, and I also love the singles. So now everybody will quote me and say WTF... let me then explain:
I was 13 years old when this album came. I didn't even own an album, I listened to some downloaded Iron Maiden and Metallica (Enter Sandman, Sad but True)... and that's like it! I thought! I considered Enter Sandman to be one of the heaviest songs ever. Then St. Anger turned up on MTV, and it was even heavier. As a 13-year old with a Metal taste that hadn't developed a bit, I couldn't resist St. Anger. I've grown up with St. Anger as a Metalhead. And for that it will always have my respect!
If you think that "St. Crapfest Anger" is the heaviest stuff you've ever heard, then you've clearly never heard the work from any death metal, black metal, or grindcore band. However, I respect that. Within a few years, you will come to hate "St. Anger" just like the majority of metalheads here.
Huh? Yeah, I love bands such as Emperor, Morbid Angel, Mayhem, Death, Burzum, Dimmu Borgir, Celtic Frost, Satyricon, Immortal etc. and of course I think St. Anger is the heaviest I've ever heard!!! C'mon, please... read what I wrote. I was 13 (4 years ago) years old and hadn't heard that much Metal, and I thought BACK THEN that it was the heaviest stuff ever...
I know. But after a few years of listening to metal you will soon come to hate "St. Anger" just like everyone else.
No, I'm pretty sure I will not. Metallica is the most important band for me... and I LOVE many songs on the album. I know that I'll never hate it.
And BTW, you think it has to do with age or something? "After a few years of listening..."? You're younger than me, I don't know how long you've listened to Metal but I've listened since I was 11 and before that I listened to Rock my whole life.
I used to think like you. I used to think that "St. Anger" was the heaviest album ever, but after just one month of listening to it, I finally came to the conclusion "Wow! This is the worst album in existence!" It may not come today, it may not come tomorrow, but someday you will realize that "St. Anger" is the most piss poor album in metal history just like everyone else.
Well I've been listening to it A LOT for 4 years now, and still think it's good. You can't tell me what the fuck I like/dislike or will like/dislike! I respect if you think my opinion is crazy, but don't fucking think you know how I think and feel!
----
Loading...
|
Insineratehymn Account deleted |
Insineratehymn Account deleted
Written by Warman on 23.06.2007 at 18:28
Written by [user id=5630] on 22.06.2007 at 00:16
Written by Warman on 21.06.2007 at 23:20
Written by [user id=5630] on 21.06.2007 at 23:15
Written by Warman on 21.06.2007 at 14:47
Written by [user id=5630] on 20.06.2007 at 22:46
Written by Warman on 20.06.2007 at 15:32
Well I consider this to be a good album, and I also love the singles. So now everybody will quote me and say WTF... let me then explain:
I was 13 years old when this album came. I didn't even own an album, I listened to some downloaded Iron Maiden and Metallica (Enter Sandman, Sad but True)... and that's like it! I thought! I considered Enter Sandman to be one of the heaviest songs ever. Then St. Anger turned up on MTV, and it was even heavier. As a 13-year old with a Metal taste that hadn't developed a bit, I couldn't resist St. Anger. I've grown up with St. Anger as a Metalhead. And for that it will always have my respect!
If you think that "St. Crapfest Anger" is the heaviest stuff you've ever heard, then you've clearly never heard the work from any death metal, black metal, or grindcore band. However, I respect that. Within a few years, you will come to hate "St. Anger" just like the majority of metalheads here.
Huh? Yeah, I love bands such as Emperor, Morbid Angel, Mayhem, Death, Burzum, Dimmu Borgir, Celtic Frost, Satyricon, Immortal etc. and of course I think St. Anger is the heaviest I've ever heard!!! C'mon, please... read what I wrote. I was 13 (4 years ago) years old and hadn't heard that much Metal, and I thought BACK THEN that it was the heaviest stuff ever...
I know. But after a few years of listening to metal you will soon come to hate "St. Anger" just like everyone else.
No, I'm pretty sure I will not. Metallica is the most important band for me... and I LOVE many songs on the album. I know that I'll never hate it.
And BTW, you think it has to do with age or something? "After a few years of listening..."? You're younger than me, I don't know how long you've listened to Metal but I've listened since I was 11 and before that I listened to Rock my whole life.
I used to think like you. I used to think that "St. Anger" was the heaviest album ever, but after just one month of listening to it, I finally came to the conclusion "Wow! This is the worst album in existence!" It may not come today, it may not come tomorrow, but someday you will realize that "St. Anger" is the most piss poor album in metal history just like everyone else.
Well I've been listening to it A LOT for 4 years now, and still think it's good. You can't tell me what the fuck I like/dislike or will like/dislike! I respect if you think my opinion is crazy, but don't fucking think you know how I think and feel!
Calm down, man. You're using too many exclamation points. Furthermore, I can right now think of 20 albums that are far heavier and also better than "St. Anger". You listen to death metal and black metal bands who have albums that are far better than "St. Anger", so I have no idea how you can think that "St. Anger" is better than any of those albums.
Loading...
|
Warman Erotic Stains
Posts: 7695 |
24.06.2007 - 14:02Rating: 9
WarmanErotic StainsPosts: 7695
Written by [user id=5630] on 23.06.2007 at 23:44
Calm down, man. You're using too many exclamation points. Furthermore, I can right now think of 20 albums that are far heavier and also better than "St. Anger". You listen to death metal and black metal bands who have albums that are far better than "St. Anger", so I have no idea how you can think that "St. Anger" is better than any of those albums.
You seriously haven't read a thing I wrote... I can think of over 100 albums that are heavier and much better than St. Anger, I consider it to be worth 7/10!
I CONSIDERED ST. ANGER TO BE THE HEAVIEST ALBUM WHEN I WAS 13 YEARS OLD AND JUST LISTENED TO IRON MAIDEN AND METALLICA! It's a good album, nothing more or less. I never said it was one of the best and I certainly haven't considered it to be the heaviest album since 4 years ago...
----
Loading...
|
Insineratehymn Account deleted |
Insineratehymn Account deleted
Written by Warman on 24.06.2007 at 14:02
Written by [user id=5630] on 23.06.2007 at 23:44
Calm down, man. You're using too many exclamation points. Furthermore, I can right now think of 20 albums that are far heavier and also better than "St. Anger". You listen to death metal and black metal bands who have albums that are far better than "St. Anger", so I have no idea how you can think that "St. Anger" is better than any of those albums.
You seriously haven't read a thing I wrote... I can think of over 100 albums that are heavier and much better than St. Anger, I consider it to be worth 7/10!
I CONSIDERED ST. ANGER TO BE THE HEAVIEST ALBUM WHEN I WAS 13 YEARS OLD AND JUST LISTENED TO IRON MAIDEN AND METALLICA! It's a good album, nothing more or less. I never said it was one of the best and I certainly haven't considered it to be the heaviest album since 4 years ago...
Of course I didn't read a word you wrote, I was too distracted by the pretty butterfly that was fluttering right next to my desk. Anyway, I'm bored and I need to go buy the moon. I will be back when I've collected enough cans to build a rocket powerful enough to escape Earth's orbit.
Loading...
|
Warman Erotic Stains
Posts: 7695 |
24.06.2007 - 14:19Rating: 9
WarmanErotic StainsPosts: 7695
Written by [user id=5630] on 24.06.2007 at 14:14
Of course I didn't read a word you wrote, I was too distracted by the pretty butterfly that was fluttering right next to my desk.
Apparently...
----
Loading...
|
+{Jonas}+ I R Serious Cat
Posts: 4955 |
10.02.2008 - 23:50Rating: 8
Written by Warman on 24.06.2007 at 14:02
Written by [user id=5630] on 23.06.2007 at 23:44
Calm down, man. You're using too many exclamation points. Furthermore, I can right now think of 20 albums that are far heavier and also better than "St. Anger". You listen to death metal and black metal bands who have albums that are far better than "St. Anger", so I have no idea how you can think that "St. Anger" is better than any of those albums.
You seriously haven't read a thing I wrote... I can think of over 100 albums that are heavier and much better than St. Anger, I consider it to be worth 7/10!
I CONSIDERED ST. ANGER TO BE THE HEAVIEST ALBUM WHEN I WAS 13 YEARS OLD AND JUST LISTENED TO IRON MAIDEN AND METALLICA! It's a good album, nothing more or less. I never said it was one of the best and I certainly haven't considered it to be the heaviest album since 4 years ago...
Son, don't argue with Insineratehymn. He will only make you piss off more with annoying arrogance.
Anyway, I agree with you, it's a good album, it's enjoyable and has some cool songs. I don't hate it, nor love it. It's still Metallica, not so good, but Metallica anyway.
----
"Nobody wants to be the weird kid, you just end up being the weird kid. You don't know how you ended up getting there" - Rob Zombie
http://jonas-bs.deviantart.com My dA, mainly photography, go check it out!
Loading...
|
Harmonic Account deleted |
Harmonic Account deleted
When I first heard St. Anger, I realized I was listening to something a bit... different. So I tried it again. But the second time I only made it half way before losing interest.
This is Metallica undergoing some bizarre form of music therapy. Well I'm glad they expressed their feelings and sincerely hope they're all feeling better now. Honestly, though - they should have kept this to themselves, kind of like how I keep my finger-painting from preschool tucked away in storage. I'd never consider framing that crap and hanging it on the living room wall - and Metallica should have never considered releasing St. Anger to the public. I figure it was Lars' idea - he's enough of an arrogant, greedy f*ck that he'd actually put the others up to it. Poor Cliff is turning in his grave.
Loading...
|
Iced Angel
Posts: 24
|
02.03.2008 - 04:40Rating: 1
I lost my faith in Metallica !! they were my heroes ... my favorite band... but after "Black Album" ... they are producing pure shit
where is that glorious band ? what is this crap ?
st. anger is the worse rock/metal album I have ever heard
Loading...
|
Valentin B Iconoclast
Posts: 10096 |
the award for most pointless debate ever goes to Insineratehymn!! wooo!!
people have different tastes, no-one can make you like or not like something. St. Anger to me is a very poor album, but to some people(regardless of age or stuff) it might be a delight. there are so many people who hate death metal but some find it artsy and beautiful and trying to prove the other side wrong is stupid and without logic.
Loading...
|
Evil Chip
Posts: 505 |
09.03.2008 - 22:07Rating: 8
I personally like this album. I think is their best effort since the boring black album and load/reload. This album is full of feeling and anger. You can actually feel through the music and the lyrics the hard moment that Metallica was through. I give it an 8. I have faith that the next album will be more like their early days.
Loading...
|
IconMaiden
Posts: 78
|
01.04.2008 - 04:26Rating: 1
this is possibly the most disappointing album of all time. worse than both load of shit and reload of shit. pathetic.
Loading...
|
IconMaiden
Posts: 78
|
01.04.2008 - 04:29Rating: 1
This band has no morals, nor respect for their legacy and no respect for their fans. This is the main distinction between Metallica and Maiden. One knows what its about, and never deviates, just innovates. The other releases an album like this, betrays its entire fanbase and soils its legacy. Maiden will forever be remembered in a positive light, with a consistent career that stayed true to what the band stood for, while Metallica will be seen as the Judas of Metal. And such a shame, considering all that they could have been.
Loading...
|
THE_BLACK_GOD Account deleted |
THE_BLACK_GOD Account deleted
Written by IconMaiden on 01.04.2008 at 04:29
This band has no morals, nor respect for their legacy and no respect for their fans. This is the main distinction between Metallica and Maiden. One knows what its about, and never deviates, just innovates. The other releases an album like this, betrays its entire fanbase and soils its legacy. Maiden will forever be remembered in a positive light, with a consistent career that stayed true to what the band stood for, while Metallica will be seen as the Judas of Metal. And such a shame, considering all that they could have been.
if james did somthing as bruce did at their music videos specially at "HOlY SMOKE's music video" i would never spell the name of metallica again. it so unmetal so funny so bad for a metal band. and if metallica brought girls on the stage for dancing u know what would i do ? i would hang myself for sure. and if a band like THE IRON MAIDENS was for metallica i would never BORN
Loading...
|
IconMaiden
Posts: 78
|
30.04.2008 - 03:36Rating: 1
Metallica didn't need a group like the Iron Maidens to ruin their music, they did it on their own. and i don't know if you watched the video for "the memory remains" but it was pretty sad.
Loading...
|
IconMaiden
Posts: 78
|
30.04.2008 - 03:41Rating: 1
The fact that you give load and reload 9/10s and every other metallica release 10/10 shows that you're a metallica fanboy and disqualifies you from making any judgment on this. And Iron Maiden are not at fault for The Iron Maidens.
Loading...
|
In_tallica
Posts: 151 |
26.06.2008 - 15:41Rating: 6
if there is one thing i dont understand, it is why is this considered a nu metal album?
im not saying that it's good, but it's definetly not nu metal, i'd call it thrash metal mainly
Loading...
|
Murder
Posts: 255 |
mmm... this album is a whole shit... that's all that i can say, and well... Could they repair their fault with Death Magnetic? I listen a streaming single but well... the song seems me really boring but I don't know... what can you say? Should I hear the album???
Loading...
|
iMorphball
Posts: 290 |
21.09.2008 - 16:10Rating: 2
Overall, this album is the worst piece of shit to come out of Metallica's ass since the Black Album (not saying it was shit, everything between there and St. Anger has been shit). They had 2 shitty albums before St. Anger and they try to come back with this... Nice.
Loading...
|
HALOOOOOOOO Account deleted |
HALOOOOOOOO Account deleted
This is not Metallica's worst album, that dishonor goes to ReLoad, followed by Load, and then St. Anger. And because I feel like making a comparison to Metallica and Megadeth, 'deth's Risk album is by far worse than any Metallica album, or many albums in general to me. Cryptic Writings is worse than Load/Reload as well.
Loading...
|
dash
Posts: 3 |
28.03.2009 - 17:31Rating: 2
I feel I should comment on this as well. I liked the older Metallica stuff, back when they actually had decent music. I don't like this album. But I do with to disagree rather pointedly with one of the statements in this review. You are obviously not a drummer. The drums are not "excellent". I'm not even sure I'd say they are "good". They are pretty "meh" in my opinion. Very little creativity, hardly any cymbal work to speak of, just the same abrasive atonal banging throughout the entire album. It doesn't take any great skill/talent to do fast double kick, and most of the drumming on St. Anger is not even particularly fast.
Long story short, if this album had been released under a pseudonym or by another band, it wouldn't have sold for shit. The only reason it gets any publicity at all is because of the once-credible monkeys who stuck their name on it.
Loading...
|
DayFly
Posts: 383 |
Eh, what a horrid review, it goes really nowhere.
Loading...
|
Dominus The Shooter
Posts: 375 |
31.03.2009 - 19:53Rating: 1
Pure shit!!!
Loading...
|