Written by Hermann Langke on 18.10.2009 at 15:48

Yup it is.do you like Kreator?

Written by DayFly on 18.10.2009 at 18:06

The first paragraph is completely bonkers, written by someone who never was around at the time but still feels compelled to give a vague account of what thrash in Germany was like. Didn't bother to read the rest.

Written by DayFly on 18.10.2009 at 18:16

Okay, I was thinking you were just trying to write some random stuff to introduce your review but it looks like you really don't know jack about anything. I'm sorry for having wasted your and, more importantly, my time.

Written by Deadmeat on 18.10.2009 at 19:28

Man.... are you serious??? you write those good words about this album, you say it is their best (probably) etc and give it an 8.4??? sorry but this is WRONG.

Written by [user id=2084] on 18.10.2009 at 21:42

I personally think that an 8.4 is an acceptable mark for this album. I wouldn't agree to it being their best release. I am biased though because I love a lot of their mid-late 90s work where a lot of people do not. You people are being really over critical and downright ASSHOLES to Nibir here and should all bite your fucking tongues. Somebody takes the time out of their day to write a decent review and you take two seconds to write a bunch of bullshit. Yes, you are all entitled to your opinions. However, opinions get out of hand when you abuse your right to an opinion and just say whatever you feel. The Bay Area Thrash Metal Scene WAS considered to be the end all be all of the evolution of thrash metal. That much is true. And you know what else is true? People weren't aware of what was happening in Europe in terms of thrash metal and eventually found out that there was something heavier, more brutal and just generally better. This happened because of tape trading VIA exportation. So, in conclusion, DAYFLY, it looks like you really don't know jackSHIT about anything and should shut your fucking mouth. And if you continue to have no respect for people on Metalstorm, maybe you should just plain go away.

Written by Hermann Langke on 18.10.2009 at 15:58

Both are great.

Written by Hermann Langke on 19.10.2009 at 15:16

Written by Deadmeat on 18.10.2009 at 19:28

Man.... are you serious??? you write those good words about this album, you say it is their best (probably) etc and give it an 8.4??? sorry but this is WRONG.

So what is your view buddy?

Written by Deadmeat on 19.10.2009 at 19:35

Written by Hermann Langke on 19.10.2009 at 15:16

Written by Deadmeat on 18.10.2009 at 19:28

Man.... are you serious??? you write those good words about this album, you say it is their best (probably) etc and give it an 8.4??? sorry but this is WRONG.

So what is your view buddy?

well this album has 5/9 masterpiece songs (1.3.5.6.8), 3/9 excellent (2.4.7) and one just great (9). i'd rate it with more than 9.3 if i wrote a review. also it has excellent production and mille's vocals are in their best form.

Written by Znoy on 19.10.2009 at 15:44

Written by Hermann Langke on 18.10.2009 at 15:58

Both are great.

Hello, Do you listen to Hordes of Chaos? I did not listen to it yet.
For my mind Cause for Conflict is the heaviest.

Written by Hermann Langke on 21.10.2009 at 12:56

Written by Deadmeat on 19.10.2009 at 19:35

Written by Hermann Langke on 19.10.2009 at 15:16

Written by Deadmeat on 18.10.2009 at 19:28

Man.... are you serious??? you write those good words about this album, you say it is their best (probably) etc and give it an 8.4??? sorry but this is WRONG.

So what is your view buddy?

well this album has 5/9 masterpiece songs (1.3.5.6.8), 3/9 excellent (2.4.7) and one just great (9). i'd rate it with more than 9.3 if i wrote a review. also it has excellent production and mille's vocals are in their best form.

I cannot just give ratings just as i wish.i have to be impartial.even i wish to give them a 9.3 or 10 but i cannot,buddy.:( and yes Mille is a great vocalist.:thumbup:

Written by Bojan on 22.10.2009 at 14:14

Very good review.

Written by Deadmeat on 21.10.2009 at 22:06

Written by Hermann Langke on 21.10.2009 at 12:56

Written by Deadmeat on 19.10.2009 at 19:35

Written by Hermann Langke on 19.10.2009 at 15:16

Written by Deadmeat on 18.10.2009 at 19:28

Man.... are you serious??? you write those good words about this album, you say it is their best (probably) etc and give it an 8.4??? sorry but this is WRONG.

So what is your view buddy?

well this album has 5/9 masterpiece songs (1.3.5.6.8), 3/9 excellent (2.4.7) and one just great (9). i'd rate it with more than 9.3 if i wrote a review. also it has excellent production and mille's vocals are in their best form.

I cannot just give ratings just as i wish.i have to be impartial.even i wish to give them a 9.3 or 10 but i cannot,buddy.:( and yes Mille is a great vocalist.:thumbup:

who says you cannot? this is YOUR review. you can give the rating you want. you dont need to give the rating that is closer to what most people think. you need to give a rating that is similar with what you say about the album.

Written by Hermann Langke on 23.10.2009 at 15:50


I did so.But i ahve to be impartial or else people would think that i am biased.

Written by Deadmeat on 23.10.2009 at 20:23

Written by Hermann Langke on 23.10.2009 at 15:50


I did so.But i ahve to be impartial or else people would think that i am biased.

i just disagree. in a review you write YOUR opinion. and everybody sees that you gave this opinion. but why not giving also the rating YOU think that fits better to the album? review=rating. they are the same thing. you say great words but give a not That great rating.

Written by Hermann Langke on 24.10.2009 at 10:23

Written by Deadmeat on 23.10.2009 at 20:23

Written by Hermann Langke on 23.10.2009 at 15:50


I did so.But i ahve to be impartial or else people would think that i am biased.

i just disagree. in a review you write YOUR opinion. and everybody sees that you gave this opinion. but why not giving also the rating YOU think that fits better to the album? review=rating. they are the same thing. you say great words but give a not That great rating.

I am modest in giving ratings as i believe a reviewer always has to be impartial and modest while judging an album.Even if i write a review for an album that i did not like,i have to rate it from a neutral perspective.I have to speak for the fans who liked or didn't like the album.So i have to be modest,Buddy.

Written by Deadmeat on 24.10.2009 at 23:02

Written by Hermann Langke on 24.10.2009 at 10:23

Written by Deadmeat on 23.10.2009 at 20:23

Written by Hermann Langke on 23.10.2009 at 15:50


I did so.But i ahve to be impartial or else people would think that i am biased.

i just disagree. in a review you write YOUR opinion. and everybody sees that you gave this opinion. but why not giving also the rating YOU think that fits better to the album? review=rating. they are the same thing. you say great words but give a not That great rating.

I am modest in giving ratings as i believe a reviewer always has to be impartial and modest while judging an album.Even if i write a review for an album that i did not like,i have to rate it from a neutral perspective.I have to speak for the fans who liked or didn't like the album.So i have to be modest,Buddy.

so you have to say: "some people like it and some not" and not say "this album is great" if you want to do what you say. the good words you said for the album are not suficient with the 8,4 rating.