I can't wait to hear the new album... BTW, it will have a cover of Rush "YYZ"

Written by [user id=100453] on 08.03.2010 at 06:02

I can't wait to hear the new album... BTW, it will have a cover of Rush "YYZ"

What?? Really? Come on come on!

Lol, the "1 has it" is classic.

How many years has it been? I dont really know what to expect.

I really hope this is good, i cant wait to hear it

These guys rarely disappoint, this one's gonna be great.

Written by [user id=100453] on 08.03.2010 at 06:02

I can't wait to hear the new album... BTW, it will have a cover of Rush "YYZ"

Listen to Xerath's cover of YYZ, excellent stuff.

Heard it twice now and really enjoy it. Kelly's vocals are a bit rougher than before, but musically it's as strong as ever.

Written by BloodTears on 26.07.2010 at 15:12

How many years has it been? I dont really know what to expect.

17, bout damn time they came out with a new album!!!!

I have no high hopes for this, but it could be a blast!

Still more than a month to go.

Written by vezzy on 12.07.2010 at 17:52

Lol, the "1 has it" is classic.

Probably a promo copy, such as I have acquired.

Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 06.09.2010 at 23:20

Heard it twice now and really enjoy it. Kelly's vocals are a bit rougher than before, but musically it's as strong as ever.

I know this is a rather shallow question (because I'm going to find out eventually and make up my own mind), but how does it compare to the other Atheist albums? Do the musical arrangements themselves stand up against their own technical work? I'm excited, so that's why I'm asking.

Written by [user id=100467] on 02.10.2010 at 17:05

Written by Marcel Hubregtse on 06.09.2010 at 23:20

Heard it twice now and really enjoy it. Kelly's vocals are a bit rougher than before, but musically it's as strong as ever.

I know this is a rather shallow question (because I'm going to find out eventually and make up my own mind), but how does it compare to the other Atheist albums? Do the musical arrangements themselves stand up against their own technical work? I'm excited, so that's why I'm asking.

I definitely think it does. Other than having a more aggressive sound (the Jason Suecof treatment) it's very much in line with old Atheist stuff. The songwriting is still just as killer, and the licks and riffs just as badass.

Holy fuck, I'm excited.

I can't find a leaked version of the album yet lol but I'm sure its awesome...

Might as well be the first metal album I check as a whole in a while. Hopefully it will be time well spent.

This album rules \m/

I seldom like tech death, but this one is great!
-Brutal
-Memorable melodies
-Technical
-Time Changes w/o souding just for the sake of it
-Audible bass

Reminds me of Elements on the first listen... vocals a bit more pronounced and distracting but other than the shortness of the album it seems very redeeming. Masters of jazz metal have a nice comeback by the sound of it... looking forward to further listening.

ATHEIST me herewith already overdue album lovely surprised.

What happened to the cover of YYZ?

Astounding.

Just bought this album today on impulse. I've yet to hear it, but I enjoy their earlier material.

Very Good

What a good suprisei i didn't expect that! It's a perfect come back according to myself. They didn't try to copy piece of time or another old stuff. But they kept the jazzy feeling with more metal parts.

Want this albulm soo hard Cheers

An excellent comeback, and one that has certainly stood the test of time too. The band haven't lost the edge that was displayed on 'Elements', and they even manage to keep the right length. I actually prefer this to 'Elements', but it seems 'Jupiter' is the most underrated Atheist album.

I forgot how great this album is. Not nearly as great as the band's earlier work, but it's still pretty solid.

Written by Auntie Sahar on 14.08.2010 at 19:45

These guys rarely disappoint, this one's gonna be great.

Moments before disaster