Ok, now I've read the whole thing. I see multiple ways of reading these "definitions". One would make us such a platform, another wouldn't. But I fail to see what Leverage Australia has over us other than blocking access

The bill also references other legislature I don't have access to for certain definitions. The language is among the weirder legislative language I've read I have to say. European laws are usually pretty clear in their definitions

Yeah that's written in 63F

They still haven't said HOW sites are to verify users' ages. Just that they aren't allowed to ask for any sort of government issued id, like drivers licences

But it also speaks of "reasonable means" that platforms have to take. We can't legally ask for government ID, so it'll be interesting to find out what constitutes as "reasonable" under that bill.

That's one of the reasons why we're not affected by the DSA. It's interesting that Australia's legislation works with such wide and blurry definitions. It seems like you can subsummize almost anything under this definition.

63C (3) is interesting: "in determining whether the condition set out in subparagraph (1)(a)(i) is satisfied, disregard and of the following purposes: (a) the provision of advertising material on the service".